2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00214.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and hedonic pricing of differentiated beef demands

Abstract: We estimate a CBS system model of U.S. derived demand for meat. We use this model (1) to examine relationships between three quality categories of beef and three other meats and (2) to simulate how taste shifts have affected demands for meats over time. We extend previous studies by disaggregating wholesale beef production into three quality categories: (1) USDA Choice grade or higher, (2) USDA Select or lower, and (3) cow and bull beef. Innovative features of our empirical model include a breakout of 'table c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to meat, the majority of studies reported in the literature consider US data including Hahn and Matthews (), Parcell and Schroeder (), Schulz et al . () and Vickner ().…”
Section: Hedonic Analysis Cool and The Horsemeat Incidentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to meat, the majority of studies reported in the literature consider US data including Hahn and Matthews (), Parcell and Schroeder (), Schulz et al . () and Vickner ().…”
Section: Hedonic Analysis Cool and The Horsemeat Incidentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to meat, the majority of studies reported in the literature consider US data including Hahn and Matthews (2007), Parcell and Schroeder (2007), Schulz et al (2012) and Vickner (2015). Studies undertaken in other countries include Ahmad and Anders (2012) in Canada.…”
Section: Hedonic Analysis Cool and The Horsemeat Incidentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little research has applied HPMs to decompose the prices paid for heterogeneous consumer packaged goods such as value‐added and frozen meat or seafood products. The majority of previous studies used stated preference and experimental methods to elicit values of the following attributes within fresh meat products: eating quality (Melton et al 1996; Hahn and Mathews 2007), fat content (Shongwe et al 2007), organic (Boland and Schroeder 2002), packaging (Harrison et al 2004), and labeling (Loureiro and McCluskey 2000; Loureiro and Umberger 2003). In addition, studies by Froehlich et al (2009), Enneking (2004), Loureiro and Umberger (2007), and Alfnes and Rickertsen (2003) focused on brand, food safety, traceability, and origin attributes that may indirectly influence prices paid.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of non-linearities in the relationships between quality attributes and their implicit prices (e.g., increasing marginal cost of quality), and the existence of attribute thresholds (e.g., private or regulatory minimum requirements) that may result in disproportional price effects. Both topics, largely neglected in empirical hedonic studies in meat marketing (e.g., Hahn and Mathews, 2007; Ahmad and Anders, 2010; Vickner, 2015)…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%