2020
DOI: 10.1089/dna.2019.5005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and Changes of DNA in Extracellular Vesicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-pass WGS (LP-WGS) studies of ctDNA in breast cancer have determined that CNVs associated with metastatic progression and treatment response can be observed longitudinally throughout patient treatment [5,6]. Recent data have also indicated that cancer-related CNVs can be detected in the DNA of cancer patient-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are membrane-bound vesicles released from a wide range of cells including tumour cells via exocytosis or membrane budding [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Interestingly, EVs are thought to be stable in the blood for up to 30 days, and the DNA within them is protected from nuclease degradation by the vesicle lipid membrane, suggesting that the assessment of EV DNA may be a promising alternative or complement to ctDNA for non-invasive cancer diagnosis and monitoring [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-pass WGS (LP-WGS) studies of ctDNA in breast cancer have determined that CNVs associated with metastatic progression and treatment response can be observed longitudinally throughout patient treatment [5,6]. Recent data have also indicated that cancer-related CNVs can be detected in the DNA of cancer patient-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are membrane-bound vesicles released from a wide range of cells including tumour cells via exocytosis or membrane budding [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Interestingly, EVs are thought to be stable in the blood for up to 30 days, and the DNA within them is protected from nuclease degradation by the vesicle lipid membrane, suggesting that the assessment of EV DNA may be a promising alternative or complement to ctDNA for non-invasive cancer diagnosis and monitoring [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, it has recently been shown that functional KRAS protein transfer from cell to cell is an extremely rare event [29]. To date, the mechanisms by which nucleic acids are sorted and packaged within EVs have yet to be elucidated [30]. However, a growing number of publications have shown that the EVs derived from primary tumors can be preferably loaded with specific molecules [31,32], and that the expression of such molecules or lack thereof contributes to shaping the phenotype of the recipient cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it is clear that DNA extracted from all categories of EVs is the latest and most promising biomarker for identifying tumor presence and complexity [79,80]. The size of dsDNA found in EVs ranges from~100 bp to~20 kbp [79], which can represent the entire genome and reflect the mutational status of tumor parental cells [15,26,81]. The EV nucleic acid (EV NA) population includes DNA and RNA of mutant or wild-type, and from this population, the target biomarker EV NA is detected more efficiently [82].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Extracellular Vesicle-derived Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%