Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3450613.3456818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising Student Engagement Modes through Low-Level Activity Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of student characteristics modeled through the approach include motivation (Taylor et al, 2004 ), boredom and curiosity (Jaques et al, 2014 ), and engagement (Monkaresi et al, 2017 ). Interaction-based approach uses learning interaction data of students to build models for predicting various student characteristics such as valence and arousal (Salmeron-Majadas et al, 2018 ); motivation (Aluja-Banet et al, 2019 ); confusion, frustration, and eureka/delight (Graesser et al, 2008 ); and engagement (Gledson et al, 2021 ). Each of the two approaches has attracted attention in research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of student characteristics modeled through the approach include motivation (Taylor et al, 2004 ), boredom and curiosity (Jaques et al, 2014 ), and engagement (Monkaresi et al, 2017 ). Interaction-based approach uses learning interaction data of students to build models for predicting various student characteristics such as valence and arousal (Salmeron-Majadas et al, 2018 ); motivation (Aluja-Banet et al, 2019 ); confusion, frustration, and eureka/delight (Graesser et al, 2008 ); and engagement (Gledson et al, 2021 ). Each of the two approaches has attracted attention in research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%