2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(00)00627-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the topography and surface potential of electrodeposited conducting polymer films using atomic force and electric force microscopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
10
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, conductive AFM imaging of polybithiophene films has revealed higher conductivity in the nodules compared to the nodular periphery 29 . These observations are further supported by Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM) of PPy/pTS films showing a more negative potential at the nodules and explained by these regions as having a higher work function, or increased doping, than their peripheries 27 . This characteristic phase separation in surface properties (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, conductive AFM imaging of polybithiophene films has revealed higher conductivity in the nodules compared to the nodular periphery 29 . These observations are further supported by Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM) of PPy/pTS films showing a more negative potential at the nodules and explained by these regions as having a higher work function, or increased doping, than their peripheries 27 . This characteristic phase separation in surface properties (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Single molecule studies take into account the multiplicity of protein interactions, especially in the case of large, modular FN protein that can exist in compact, semi-compact and extended conformations 25 , as well as having polyampholyte characteristics that makes it easily deformable on high charge density surfaces 26 . Furthermore, the complex surface properties of conducting polymers, due to different oxidation states 27 , inhomogenous 44 doping 28 and phase separation of properties (e.g. surface potential and conductivity) 29,30 , that have been shown to display nanoscale lateral variation are expected to amplify variations in the conformation and adhesion of individual proteins across the polymer surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…para-toluene sulfonate (pTs) dopant was also tested, as previous neural recording data has shown it to have a high charge density and good acute recording performance 20 . Dodecylbenzenesulfonate (DBSA) dopant was also used, as it has a similar structure to pTs and had good cultured cell viability when used to dope polypyrrole [21][22][23] . PEDOT-PSS and PEDOT-DBSA were deposited for 4 different times (15,30,45 or 60 s), PEDOTpTs was deposited for 45s as recommended in our previous article 20 .…”
Section: Page 6 Of 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3a shows poly(1,3-DAB) film synthesized directly on a platinum foil having a thickness of 0.025 mm and it reveals the presence of the typical globular structure of the electrosynthesized polymers [21]. In any case this nodular arrangement produces a dense and overlapped polymeric film (Fig.…”
Section: Morphological Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%