2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of polymeric UF membranes by liquid–liquid displacement porosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in an earlier paper [25], it has been shown that EP can be readily adapted to characterize hollow fiber membranes, which are widely employed in MF applications. It should also be noted that wetting liquids can cause some degree of membrane swelling when the volatile wetting liquid is allowed to remain in contact with the membrane for a prolonged time [26,[33][34][35], which can skew the results of the PSD due to the increase in the pore volume and hence surface area of the membrane pores. However, because the Anopore membranes studied here are composed of aluminum oxide, membrane swelling does not occur when they are immersed in IPA or 1-butanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in an earlier paper [25], it has been shown that EP can be readily adapted to characterize hollow fiber membranes, which are widely employed in MF applications. It should also be noted that wetting liquids can cause some degree of membrane swelling when the volatile wetting liquid is allowed to remain in contact with the membrane for a prolonged time [26,[33][34][35], which can skew the results of the PSD due to the increase in the pore volume and hence surface area of the membrane pores. However, because the Anopore membranes studied here are composed of aluminum oxide, membrane swelling does not occur when they are immersed in IPA or 1-butanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant hydrodynamic properties of the two detergents are summarized in Table I. Precut composite regenerated cellulose membranes (Ultracel PLGC0251 membranes, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) with nominal molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of 10 kDa and 30 kDa, corresponding to pore sizes of 2.2 AE 0.1 nm and 4.3 AE 0.8 nm (Peinador et al, 2010), respectively, were used for the experiments. The Ultracel membranes are highly hydrophilic and have very low fouling during protein ultrafiltration (van Reis and Zydney, 2007).…”
Section: Stirred-cell Ultrafiltration Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosimeter used in the analysis consists in an automated device developed in the SMAP laboratories in the University of Valladolid [15,19]. A detailed description of the equipment and the experimental procedure can be seen elsewhere [15].…”
Section: Liquid-liquid Displacement Porosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equipment can be used to obtain important information on the structure of UF membranes, including pore size distribution and porosity [14][15][16][17][18][19]. This equipment has been used in this work to characterize several virus retentive membranes, at a research stage, and the information obtained is correlated and compared with results from other virus membranes characterization methods, to give an idea on how LLDP can be of help to membrane manufacturers and end-users for an appropriate selection of membrane characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%