2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of friction and heat partition coefficients at the tool-work material interface in cutting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…from 0.2 to about 0.6). Increasing the cutting speed these differences are getting smaller and the curves approach a value of 0.2 in dry conditions, which corresponds to a semi-solid frictional regime as assumed by Neugebauer et al [6] and Rech et al [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…from 0.2 to about 0.6). Increasing the cutting speed these differences are getting smaller and the curves approach a value of 0.2 in dry conditions, which corresponds to a semi-solid frictional regime as assumed by Neugebauer et al [6] and Rech et al [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The heat partition coefficient for the tool (l) was selected as 0.85 and 0.60 corresponding to the two cutting speeds as reported in [18].…”
Section: Thermal Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the tribological characteristics of the tool-chip and tool-workpiece interfaces, Zorev's model was used [9]. The value of the friction coefficient was determined from tribological tests described in [10]. These tests enabled the determination of the apparent friction coefficient (m app ), which includes both contributions of interfacial (local) adhesive phenomena (m adh ) and macroscopic plastic deformation (m plast ).…”
Section: Numerical Models and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%