2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of a High-Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtered C/Mo/W wear resistant coating by transmission electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus substrates deposited using one-fold rotation received a higher ad-atom flux and ion energies compared to those with three-fold rotation [51]. In other words, in three-fold rotation the substrate moved further away and closer to the plasma region influencing the plasma exposure time and deposition rate [52,53,54]. In this work, 2D coatings deposited with one-fold rotation, a high silicon target power and an N/Si ratio close to 1 (ranging from 0.98 to 1.03) showed higher coating densities compared to the 3D coatings (with a N/Si ratio ranging from 0.78 to 0.95).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus substrates deposited using one-fold rotation received a higher ad-atom flux and ion energies compared to those with three-fold rotation [51]. In other words, in three-fold rotation the substrate moved further away and closer to the plasma region influencing the plasma exposure time and deposition rate [52,53,54]. In this work, 2D coatings deposited with one-fold rotation, a high silicon target power and an N/Si ratio close to 1 (ranging from 0.98 to 1.03) showed higher coating densities compared to the 3D coatings (with a N/Si ratio ranging from 0.78 to 0.95).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sci. 2021, 11, 10189 9 of 22 carbide phases (WC, W2C and Mo2C) in these coatings [21,28], where C4 and C6 particularly contained more metal carbide phases due to their high Mo+W content and therefore high hardness as compared to C2. Similarly, average elastic modulus values of ~194.5, ~236.2 and ~268.5 GPa were observed for C2, C4 and C6, respectively.…”
Section: Coating Microstructure and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A high C/(Mo+W) ratio of C2 led to an average nano-hardness value of ~1335.8 HV, whereas both C4 and C6 showed average nano-hardness values of ~1677.5 and ~1702.4 HV, respectively, due to low C/(Mo+W) ratios. This could be directly linked to the presence of hard carbide phases (WC, W 2 C and Mo 2 C) in these coatings [21,28], where C4 and C6 particularly contained more metal carbide phases due to their high Mo+W content and therefore high hardness as compared to C2. Similarly, average elastic modulus values of ~194.5, ~236.2 and ~268.5 GPa were observed for C2, C4 and C6, respectively.…”
Section: Coating Microstructure and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%