1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0580-9517(08)70490-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter V Phage Typing of Klebsiella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phage typing of Klebsiella was first developed in the 1960s (196,223). Although the phage reaction is easily read and the reproducibility of the method is acceptable, this technique shows a relatively poor typing rate of 19 to 67% (209,222). Since it is not an alternative to capsule typing, this procedure has never become widespread and is useful mainly as a secondary method in combination with serologic testing (48,53,113).…”
Section: Phage Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phage typing of Klebsiella was first developed in the 1960s (196,223). Although the phage reaction is easily read and the reproducibility of the method is acceptable, this technique shows a relatively poor typing rate of 19 to 67% (209,222). Since it is not an alternative to capsule typing, this procedure has never become widespread and is useful mainly as a secondary method in combination with serologic testing (48,53,113).…”
Section: Phage Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0-serotyping is impeded by heat stability of the capsule (14). Lysotyping is inadequate since only 60% of the strains respond and the most frequently encountered type constitutes 20% of the total (16,18). Biotyping may be useful when precise standardization of substrate concentrations is observed (2), but in our hands the API 20E was unsatisfactory since two-thirds (of 259 nonepidemic isolates) were of one biotype.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When several concomitant or successive cases of infection occur, typing is essential (i) to clarify if these are part of an outbreak or just coincidental, sporadic cases, and (ii) to identify the source of infection and the route of transmission. Various typing methods have been used in these epidemiological studies: K‐typing [ 7–9], biotyping [ 10,11], bacteriocin‐typing [ 12], phage typing [ 13–16], typing by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) [ 17], ribotyping [ 18], and DNA homology analysis [ 19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%