2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 8 Growth Econometrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
605
1
19

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 804 publications
(638 citation statements)
references
References 280 publications
13
605
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…First, data on both mortality and government health expenditure are unlikely to be comparable across countries. Second, the estimates in these studies are subject to bias on account of unobserved heterogeneity that might be correlated with the variable of interest (see Durlauf et al 2005). The present study addresses the first problem by using sub-national data, and the second problem by using panel data on state health expenditure and income.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, data on both mortality and government health expenditure are unlikely to be comparable across countries. Second, the estimates in these studies are subject to bias on account of unobserved heterogeneity that might be correlated with the variable of interest (see Durlauf et al 2005). The present study addresses the first problem by using sub-national data, and the second problem by using panel data on state health expenditure and income.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a concern is that the data is subject to large outliers; see Temple (1999) and Durlauf, Johnson & Temple (2005 …”
Section: Economic Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a higher mean population growth rate will generally lead to a lower mean growth rate. This type of correlation between explanatory variables x i,t and countryspecific effects µ i is unaccounted for in random effects models and leads to biased parameter estimates; see Durlauf et al (2005) for a discussion of this issue in the context of economic growth. To overcome this issue we standardize the explanatory variables to have mean zero and unit variance for each country.…”
Section: Student's T Dynamic Panel Data Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Using a worldwide sample of countries from 1960 to 2009, our analysis on the role of natural capital on economic growth is based on the augmented Solow model with a set of new growth theories (Solow, 1956and Durlauf et al, 2005, 2008a.…”
Section: Natural Capital and Macroeconomic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of agreed theoretical bases for empirical work and for a reduced form to apply in empirical analyses, has led researchers to abandon any a priori models and to let the data show which variables are correlated with economic growth through model uncertainty (Capolupo, 2009). In order to estimate accurately the role of the so-called new growth theories such as natural capital in determining economic growth, Durlauf et al (2005Durlauf et al ( , 2008a and Sala-i- Martin et al (2004) propose the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) methodology. 4 There is indeed a problem of model uncertainty when performing economic growth estimations that account for new growth theories Durlauf, 2001, Brock et al, 2003).…”
Section: Natural Capital and Macroeconomic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%