Multilingual Urban Scandinavia 2010
DOI: 10.21832/9781847693143-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 6. On Some Structural Aspects of Norwegian Spoken among Adolescents in Multilingual Settings in Oslo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that young people with Norwegian-born (grand)parents also use this speech style, as evidenced by research, is entirely erased (e.g. Aarsaether 2010;Opsahl 2009;Opsahl and Nistov 2010;Svendsen and Røyneland 2008). The iconisation of the link between kebabnorsk and young people with a 'minority background' thus projects an image of these youths almost as if unemployment is necessarily determined by their biological or cultural essence (cf.…”
Section: Excerptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that young people with Norwegian-born (grand)parents also use this speech style, as evidenced by research, is entirely erased (e.g. Aarsaether 2010;Opsahl 2009;Opsahl and Nistov 2010;Svendsen and Røyneland 2008). The iconisation of the link between kebabnorsk and young people with a 'minority background' thus projects an image of these youths almost as if unemployment is necessarily determined by their biological or cultural essence (cf.…”
Section: Excerptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view neglects the immense social and linguistic diversity found among speakers, and undermines individual agencies by failing to report that the adolescents are aware of, and actively differentiate between, contexts in which to use these speech styles (e.g. Opsahl and Nistov 2010;Marzo and Ceuleers 2011;Madsen and Svendsen 2015;Svendsen and Røyneland 2008). The adolescents in the UPUS/Oslo-project, for instance, spoke more 'standard-like' in the interview with the researchers than in the peer conversations (Opsahl and Nistov 2010).…”
Section: Excerpt 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations