Chapter 21 EU Port Policy: Implications for Port Governance in Europe

Pallis, Athanasios A.

doi:10.1016/s0739-8859(06)17021-3

Cited by 11 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Las nuevas revisiones se centran en dos elementos: la transcendencia estratégica de los puertos, por un lado, y el marco de acceso al mercado de servicios portuarios y la transparencia financiera de los puertos, por otro. En la mayoría de los trabajos que hacen mención a la política portuaria europea (Chlomoudis y Pallis, 2002, 2005Guillaume, 2011;Pallis, 2002Pallis, , 2007Petit, Beresford, Marlow y Smith, 2008;Psaraftis, 2005;Verhoeven, 2006Verhoeven, , 2009Verhoeven, , 2015Verhoeven y Vanoutrive, 2012) se insiste en esos planteamientos y, al mismo tiempo, se reconoce la gran dificultad de abordarlos, ya que el propio sector portuario europeo no es homogéneo y reposa en varios modelos organizativos privados y públicos diferentes.…”

Section: Reflexiones Finalesunclassified

A Política Portuaria Europea: os novos desafíos da gobernanza

Laxe

2020

Rev. galega econ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La Unión Europea carece de una legislación única en materia portuaria, salvo disposiciones relativas a las instalaciones portuarias y al funcionamiento de determinados servicios técnico-náuticos. Europa cuenta con más de 1.200 puertos, de los que 319 entre globales y básicos están integrados en el conjunto de las Redes Transeuropeas de Transporte. Los puertos desempeñan un rol esencial en lo que se refiere a los intercambios comerciales de la UE y en lo que concierne al servicio de pasajeros en la medida que son nodos clave en la red comercial mundial. Así, el 74% de las mercancías extracomunitarias se envían a través de los puertos. El sector portuario europeo no es homogéneo y reposa sobre diversos modelos organizativos. La diversidad portuaria europea, con diferenciación significativa en cuanto a tamaño, tipo, organización y forma de conectarse, hace difícil definir una estrategia conjunta para afrontar los grandes retos actuales. El trabajo aborda el análisis de los avances en la construcción de una política común portuaria y al mismo tiempo se exponen las distintas concepciones cruzadas de los actores del negocio marítimo y portuario.

show abstract

Section: Reflexiones Finalesunclassified

A Política Portuaria Europea: os novos desafíos da gobernanza

Laxe

2020

Rev. galega econ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…the WBPRT combined with the highly distinctive and diverse institutional frameworks already in place has led to asymmetric implementation of similarly intended reforms (Ng and Pallis, 2013). The issue of implementation of a generic framework in countries and ports with heterogeneous traditions is also emphasized by Pallis (2006). In a similar vein, the concept of institutional plasticity, the stretching and reshaping of institutional arrangements to fit a particular purpose, has been used as a way to understand port development (Notteboom et al, 2013).…”

Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons from port sector regulatory reforms in Denmark: An analysis of port governance and institutional structure outcomes

Merkel¹,

Sløk-Madsen

2019

Transport Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Regarding Latin America, that evolution provided two different models of port governance: models 1.0 and 2.0 (see Sanchez and Pinto 2015. ) 2 For a deeper knowledge of the effect of the legal proposals in port governance, see (Pallis 2007).…”

Section: Endnotesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The adaptation process in port governance: the case of the Latin countries in South America and Europe

Laxe

Sánchez²,

García-Alonso

2016

J. shipp. trd.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The particular location of port infrastructure holds characteristics that determine the activity of the port, both with respect to traffic and with respect to implementing competitive strategies; and the efficiency and efficacy of infrastructure depend on the governance systems that regulate the ports. Likewise, the development of port activity echoes in the regional economy as well, hence governance becomes integral to maximizing the impact of ports on their region's economic development. However, the activity of a port transcends the domestic/regional frontiers, as long as the port intends to take part in a global supply chain. Achieving this aim poses a challenge on the authorities that govern port activity, and this challenge needs to be seized when it comes to adjusting the governance to external and internal goals. In the specific case of the analysed ports, the prevailing governance model is known as Landlord, which differs noticeably from port to port. These differences make it possible to distinguish the orientation of European ports from that of the analysed Latin American ports, showing a dissimilar adjustment of the conception of governance that followed objectives that were not simultaneous. The paper draws forth a questioning of the uniqueness of the denomination Landlord and its legitimacy given the new challenges. Furthermore, the paper opens the way to understanding the need to adapt governance to changes, given the examined experiences. The analysis covers the following cases: Argentina,

show abstract

Chapter 21 EU Port Policy: Implications for Port Governance in Europe

Cited by 11 publications

References 16 publications

A Política Portuaria Europea: os novos desafíos da gobernanza

A Política Portuaria Europea: os novos desafíos da gobernanza

Lessons from port sector regulatory reforms in Denmark: An analysis of port governance and institutional structure outcomes

The adaptation process in port governance: the case of the Latin countries in South America and Europe

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About