1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60370-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 19 Temporal covariance of postsynaptic membrane potential and synaptic input – role in synaptic efficacy in visual cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the specific underlying mechanisms, our results are consistent with the well-accepted notion that the presence of correlated activities in both presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons, which occur as a result ofcorrelated visual inputs from both eyes, is necessary to maintain cortical binocularity (Rauschecker, 199 1;Friedlander et al, 1993). Suppression could disrupt the maintenance ofnormal ocular dominance by inhibiting or altering the neuronal firing patterns of one or both eyes' inputs, or directly affecting the activity of postsynaptic units and, thus, create a decorrelation of signals between the two eyes or between pre-and postsynaptic neurons (Movshon and Kiorpes, 1990).…”
Section: Suppressionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regardless of the specific underlying mechanisms, our results are consistent with the well-accepted notion that the presence of correlated activities in both presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons, which occur as a result ofcorrelated visual inputs from both eyes, is necessary to maintain cortical binocularity (Rauschecker, 199 1;Friedlander et al, 1993). Suppression could disrupt the maintenance ofnormal ocular dominance by inhibiting or altering the neuronal firing patterns of one or both eyes' inputs, or directly affecting the activity of postsynaptic units and, thus, create a decorrelation of signals between the two eyes or between pre-and postsynaptic neurons (Movshon and Kiorpes, 1990).…”
Section: Suppressionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There is an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence for Hebbian synapses of some kind in the visual cortex (reviewed by Constantine-Paton et al 1990, Rauschecker 1991, Friedlander et al 1993. There is a small amount of direct evidence (Frégnac et al 1988, Greuel et al 1988 showing that stimulation of afferent pathways to a cell in combination with depolarization of the cell will lead to strengthening of the effects of afferent stimulation alone.…”
Section: Hebb Synapsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional results support the hypothesis that the postsynaptic membrane potential regulates the direction of synaptic gain changes. In slice preparations of kitten and adult guinea pig visual cortex, the same postsynaptic potential was either potentiated or depressed by pairing white matter stimulation with hyperpolarizing or depolarizing pulses to the postsynaptic cell (Friedlander et al, 1993;Fregnac et al, 1994). Using, different stimulation parameters, Hirsch & Gilbert (1993) have also demonstrated long-term modifications of synaptic efficacy in slices of cat visual cortex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synaptic modification rules proposed in the BCM model have been used to explain the results of many normal rearing and classical deprivation studies (Clothiaux et al, 1991;Law et al, 1994), and are also supported by a host of experimental evidence in kitten, rat, and guinea pig visual cortex (Bear et al, 1987;Greuel et al, 1988;Reiter & Stryker, 1988;Fregnac et al, 1988Fregnac et al, , 1992Artola et al, 1990;Friedlander et al, 1993;Shulz et al, 1993;Fregnac et al, 1994;Bear, 1995;Kirkwood, 1996) and in rat hippocampus (Dudek & Bear, 1992). In in vivo studies from Fregnac's group (Fregnac et al, 1988(Fregnac et al, , 1992, a differential pairing procedure was used to impose temporal correlations between visual afferent activity and postsynaptic firing induced iontophoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%