1998
DOI: 10.1017/s0952523898151143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticity of neuronal response properties in adult cat striate cortex

Abstract: We have utilized an associative conditioning paradigm to induce changes in the receptive field (RF) properties of neurons in the adult cat striate cortex. During conditioning, the presentation of particular visual stimuli were repeatedly paired with the iontophoretic application of either GABA or glutamate to control postsynaptic firing rates. Similar paradigms have been used in kitten visual cortex to alter RF properties (Fregnac et al., 1988, 1992; Greuel et al., 1988; Shulz & Fregnac, 1992). Roughly half of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(100 reference statements)
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial selectivity of the effect is demonstrated by the fact that the ON–OFF balance remains unchanged in the unpaired position (right column). Our findings of induced changes in the simple/complex profile of visual cortical RFs were also corroborated by a follow-up study using a phase conditioning protocol (McLean and Palmer, 1998), where the authors observed the induction of counter-phased modulated responses to stimuli presented at the spatial phase which initially did not evoke any response (« null» phase).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatial selectivity of the effect is demonstrated by the fact that the ON–OFF balance remains unchanged in the unpaired position (right column). Our findings of induced changes in the simple/complex profile of visual cortical RFs were also corroborated by a follow-up study using a phase conditioning protocol (McLean and Palmer, 1998), where the authors observed the induction of counter-phased modulated responses to stimuli presented at the spatial phase which initially did not evoke any response (« null» phase).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This shift in functional preference could reach up to 90° for orientation and corresponded to the de novo emergence of a new directional selectivity at the peak of the critical period (see example in Figure 2A). Our findings were replicated in kitten (Greuel et al, 1988) and later in adult cat cortex (McLean and Palmer, 1998), using a pharmacological control of postsynaptic activity. The phenomenology of the reported functional changes were supportive of the BCM theory predictions: (1) the largest changes were observed in cells which were the less selective and the most totipotent to stimulus features, and (2) changes were more readily observed in immature than in already specialized cortex, reflecting a dependency of the “floating plasticity threshold” on past experience.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In other words, artificial modulation of the covariance between pre-and postsynaptic activity can induce changes in the receptive field properties of sensory neurons that are consistent with the operation of Hebb-like learning rules. Similar effects have been observed after the application of natural neurotransmitters such as ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate (McLean and Palmer, 1998). Analogous studies carried out in the auditory cortex using tones of different frequency have generated effects lasting Յ30 min (Cruikshank and Weinberger, 1996).…”
Section: Martin and Morrissupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Covariance-based algorithms predict that the same synapse can both increase and decrease its synaptic efficacy, thereby allowing the connectivity state of the network to evolve into non-trivial states, i.e., non-diverging stable points that attract the dynamics of the system. Correlation-based algorithms of synaptic modification have been extensively studied experimentally in vivo in the developing visual cortex (Frégnac et al, 1988, 1992; Reiter and Stryker, 1988; Frégnac and Shulz, 1989; Bear et al, 1990; Debanne et al, 1998; McLean and Palmer, 1998), the adult visual cortex (Shulz and Frégnac, 1992) and the adult auditory cortex (Ahissar et al, 1992, 1998; Cruikshank and Weinberger, 1996). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%