2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9407-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 16 C4 Photosynthesis Origins in the Monocots: A Review and Reanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Members of Cleomaceae are the closest C4 relatives to the model plant Arabidopsis. This important photosynthetic pathway increases photosynthetic efficiency under certain conditions and impacts angiosperm diversification, biogeography, and community assembly (Brown & al., 2005(Brown & al., , 2011Roalson, 2007Roalson, , 2008Roalson, , 2011Roalson, , 2012Christin & al., 2008;Besnard & al., 2009;. Gynandropsis gynandra is the beststudied C4 species in Cleomaceae, although additional C4 and C3-C4 intermediate species exist (Marshall & al., 2007;Voznesenskaya & al., 2007;Koteyeva & al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of Cleomaceae are the closest C4 relatives to the model plant Arabidopsis. This important photosynthetic pathway increases photosynthetic efficiency under certain conditions and impacts angiosperm diversification, biogeography, and community assembly (Brown & al., 2005(Brown & al., , 2011Roalson, 2007Roalson, , 2008Roalson, , 2011Roalson, , 2012Christin & al., 2008;Besnard & al., 2009;. Gynandropsis gynandra is the beststudied C4 species in Cleomaceae, although additional C4 and C3-C4 intermediate species exist (Marshall & al., 2007;Voznesenskaya & al., 2007;Koteyeva & al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite extensive studies, the evolutionary history of the C 4 trait is still hotly debated in some clades, including the grass family (Poaceae), which is the most important C 4 family, containing about 60% of all C 4 species ( Sage, 2004 ) and many C 4 crops such as maize, sorghum, or sugarcane. Consequently, the reconstruction of photosynthetic transitions in grasses is problematic and has led to contrasting results according to species sampling and reconstruction methods, ranging from a predominance of C 4 gains over C 4 to C 3 reversals ( Giussani et al, 2001 ;Christin et al, 2008 ;Roalson, in press) to a very small number of C 4 origins followed by many losses ( Duvall et al, 2003 ;Edwards and Still, 2008 ). The phylogenetic information available for grasses is constantly increasing and shows that many C 4 clades are separated by C 3 clades ( Giussani et al, 2001 ;Duvall et al, 2003 ;Christin et al, 2008 ;Vicentini et al, 2008 ;Ibrahim et al, 2009 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogenetic information available for grasses is constantly increasing and shows that many C 4 clades are separated by C 3 clades ( Giussani et al, 2001 ;Duvall et al, 2003 ;Christin et al, 2008 ;Vicentini et al, 2008 ;Ibrahim et al, 2009 ). Consequently, the reconstruction of photosynthetic transitions in grasses is problematic and has led to contrasting results according to species sampling and reconstruction methods, ranging from a predominance of C 4 gains over C 4 to C 3 reversals ( Giussani et al, 2001 ;Christin et al, 2008 ;Roalson, in press) to a very small number of C 4 origins followed by many losses ( Duvall et al, 2003 ;Edwards and Still, 2008 ). Some other studies concluded to a complex history of multiple C 4 appearances, followed by C 4 to C 3 reversals and secondary C 4 reacquisitions ( Vicentini et al, 2008 ;Bouchenak-Khelladi et al, 2009 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future work it might be useful to compare various phylogenetic approaches. An alternative to the estimated rates approach used here might be an actual tally of inferred transitions, using stochastic mapping ( Bollback, 2006 ; for implementation in grasses see Roalson, 2011 ) or parsimony reconstruction. Another might be to simply compare the fit of a suite of character evolution models and choose the best-fit model with likelihood scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%