2014
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny and the inference of evolutionary trajectories

Abstract: SummaryWe simulated ordered and unordered character evolution across phylogenetic trees to understand how tree size, models of evolution, and sampling efforts influence the ability to detect an evolutionary trajectory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all lineages investigated, a high BS : M has been found in C 3 plants that are close relatives of C 4 plants, suggesting that a high BS : M trait is ancestral to the clade in question, and thus evolves before any implementation of a C 4 biochemical cycle. This does seem to be the most parsimonious explanation, although any sort of formal ancestral state reconstruction analysis is rarely performed (Hancock & Edwards, ).…”
Section: The C4 Evolutionary Trajectory: Anatomy First Biochemistry mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all lineages investigated, a high BS : M has been found in C 3 plants that are close relatives of C 4 plants, suggesting that a high BS : M trait is ancestral to the clade in question, and thus evolves before any implementation of a C 4 biochemical cycle. This does seem to be the most parsimonious explanation, although any sort of formal ancestral state reconstruction analysis is rarely performed (Hancock & Edwards, ).…”
Section: The C4 Evolutionary Trajectory: Anatomy First Biochemistry mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if evolutionary responses are rapid enough, it becomes impossible to identify the evolutionary sequences and transitional conditions that might provide us with clues about cause and effect, especially about evolutionary events that happened long ago. Faced with these difficulties, convincing answers may not be achieved using phylogenies alone (Christin et al 2010;Hancock and Edwards 2014). Progress, then, depends on the integration of phylogenetic studies with other lines of evidence (Weber and Agrawal 2012;Olson and Arroyo-Santos 2015) and, as we highlight, perhaps by further deconstruction of the traits and potential selective factors of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Reconstructing the evolution of C 4 photosynthesis is challenging as it requires the complex coordination of anatomical, ultrastructural, biochemical, and gene regulatory changes from C 3 ancestors ( Hibberd and Covshoff, 2010 ; Gowik and Westhoff, 2011 ; Sage et al , 2012 , 2014 ; Williams et al , 2012 ; Hancock and Edwards, 2014 ). In bringing together these aspects, a model of C 4 evolution where Kranz anatomy is formed around individual veins has been developed over the last 30 years, which includes potential evolutionary precursors and a number of transitional, evolutionary-stable states ( Monson et al , 1984 ; Edwards and Ku, 1987 ; Sage, 2004 ; Gowik and Westhoff, 2011 ; Sage et al , 2012 , 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%