2008 3rd International Conference on Geometric Modeling and Imaging 2008
DOI: 10.1109/gmai.2008.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 15: Estimation of Noise in Gray-Scale and Colored Images Using Median Absolute Deviation (MAD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this part, four classical noise level estimation methods and three state-of-the-art noise level estimation methods are introduced in the comparison experiments to evaluate the performance of the proposed AWGN level estimation method. The Immerkær’s fast noise variance estimation (FNVE) [9], Khalil’s median absolute deviation (MAD) based noise estimation [39], Santiago’s variance mode (VarMode) noise level estimation [40] and Zoran’s discrete cosine transform (DCT) based noise estimation [12] were chosen as the classical noise level estimation methods. The Olivier’s nonlinear noise estimator (NOLSE) [11], Pyatykh’s principal component analysis (PPCA) based noise esti-mation [17] and Lyu’s noise variance estimation (EstV) [13] were selected as the state-of-the-art noise estimation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this part, four classical noise level estimation methods and three state-of-the-art noise level estimation methods are introduced in the comparison experiments to evaluate the performance of the proposed AWGN level estimation method. The Immerkær’s fast noise variance estimation (FNVE) [9], Khalil’s median absolute deviation (MAD) based noise estimation [39], Santiago’s variance mode (VarMode) noise level estimation [40] and Zoran’s discrete cosine transform (DCT) based noise estimation [12] were chosen as the classical noise level estimation methods. The Olivier’s nonlinear noise estimator (NOLSE) [11], Pyatykh’s principal component analysis (PPCA) based noise esti-mation [17] and Lyu’s noise variance estimation (EstV) [13] were selected as the state-of-the-art noise estimation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the value of a data point is replaced by that of the median of all data points in a neighborhood w [ 14 ], such that: y[m,n] = median {x[i,j], (i,j) ϵ w} (ii) Median absolute deviation (MAD): This is calculated by taking the absolute difference between each point and the median, and then calculating the median of those differences. This is more robust than using the standard deviation for outlier detection as the standard deviation is itself affected by the presence of outliers [ 15 ]. (d) Inter-quartile range(IQR): The concepts of using the Z-score and inter-quartile range (IQR) to study outliers were discussed in our previous study [ 1 ].…”
Section: Experimental Methodology and Data Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median absolute deviation counters the idea of the mean absolute deviation in estimating noise [23]. The median absolute deviation is more robust than the mean absolute deviation and is less affected by outliers, which makes the edges in non-smooth regions less affected by the overall score.…”
Section: Noise Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%