“…The initial action-research experience in Pinares de Oriente was expanded to two further communities in Medellín (Table 1; Medellín, Phase 2) with a similar exposure to landslide risk due to their location on steep slopes, high above the city in the northeast sector. The aim of this research was to apply a refined methodology to neighbourhoods with different histories and community characteristics, to explore the potential for transferring this approach to different socio-economic and political contexts within the same city (Smith et al 2020b(Smith et al , 2021. The settlements chosen for this phase of the research included El Pacífico (in Comuna 8), a dense and consolidated neighbourhood, and Carpinelo 2 (in Comuna 1), a more recently settled and much less consolidated community (see Smith et al 2020b for further details).…”
Section: Research Phase 2: Expansion Of Refined Methodology To Two Additional Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this alternative approach, the co-production of risk management can be achieved through the implementation of a 'dialogue of knowledges' between diverse stakeholders in a specific territory, by creating a space for knowledge exchange and conflict resolution to allow negotiated agreements and solutions to be reached (e.g., Garcia Ferrari et al 2021, Smith et al 2020a, 2020b. This dialogue entails placing local knowledge on a level platform with technical and scientific knowledge, allowing actors such as community representatives, government institutions, NGOs, the private sector, and academia to collaborate and co-design strategies for risk management that are culturally and technically appropriate and accepted, and therefore sustainable.…”
Section: Co-production Approaches To Build Adaptive Capacity To Climate-change-related Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial research in Medellín focused on the development of co-produced solutions to monitor and mitigate landslide risk in informal communities at the urban-rural city edge (Smith et al 2020a(Smith et al , 2020b(Smith et al , 2021. The research took place in the Pinares de Oriente neighbourhood, within Comuna 8, one of the low-income districts located high above the city in the north-eastern sector, where largely self-built communities have grown on steep slopes.…”
Section: Research Phase 1: Initial Pilot Study Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research found that (1) community-based monitoring of landslide risk can be effective, but requires an ongoing and close link between the participating residents and the research team; (2) there is a need for local researchers and community leaders who are able to visit the area regularly and discuss the practicalities of data collection with the participants, as this provides 'a face' on the ground; (3) it is necessary to share with participants how the information is used and analysed across the involved national and international academic institutions to build trust; and (4) although the researchers and community members agreed upon the scale and ambition of the monitoring points, it proved to be challenging for community volunteers to cover all of these points on a regular basis, with some critical points receiving much lower attention than others, depending on the availability and interest of those undertaking the monitoring exercise (Smith et al 2020b). In terms of capacity building, rooted in the experiences and approach of the research project, the local NGO ConVivamos created a Hillside Neighbourhood School (Escuela de Barrios de Ladera) at the wider scale of Comuna 8, in collaboration with community leaders.…”
Section: Research Phase 1: Initial Pilot Study Communitymentioning
Traditional top-down strategies to reduce climate-change-related risks have often failed to produce tangible results in vulnerable urban areas of the Global South. Approaches based on the co-production of adaptation solutions between diverse stakeholders offer promising alternative strategies. This contribution draws on our experiences in growing informal and low-income urban areas in two Latin American cities, Medell�n (Colombia) and Puebla (Mexico). These communities lack adequate access to clean water and are exposed to risks related to increasingly frequent high-intensity rainfall events, making water management a key consideration for risk reduction. However, the factors driving insufficient water access and the perceptions of risks vary in each location, demonstrating the need for context-specific solutions. We explore how increasing community agency and co-creating knowledge for risk management between diverse stakeholders at a range of geographical scales can contribute to redressing existing social and environmental injustices, by identifying, implementing, and scaling up technically appropriate and culturally sustainable solutions aimed at reducing climate-change-related risks.
“…The initial action-research experience in Pinares de Oriente was expanded to two further communities in Medellín (Table 1; Medellín, Phase 2) with a similar exposure to landslide risk due to their location on steep slopes, high above the city in the northeast sector. The aim of this research was to apply a refined methodology to neighbourhoods with different histories and community characteristics, to explore the potential for transferring this approach to different socio-economic and political contexts within the same city (Smith et al 2020b(Smith et al , 2021. The settlements chosen for this phase of the research included El Pacífico (in Comuna 8), a dense and consolidated neighbourhood, and Carpinelo 2 (in Comuna 1), a more recently settled and much less consolidated community (see Smith et al 2020b for further details).…”
Section: Research Phase 2: Expansion Of Refined Methodology To Two Additional Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this alternative approach, the co-production of risk management can be achieved through the implementation of a 'dialogue of knowledges' between diverse stakeholders in a specific territory, by creating a space for knowledge exchange and conflict resolution to allow negotiated agreements and solutions to be reached (e.g., Garcia Ferrari et al 2021, Smith et al 2020a, 2020b. This dialogue entails placing local knowledge on a level platform with technical and scientific knowledge, allowing actors such as community representatives, government institutions, NGOs, the private sector, and academia to collaborate and co-design strategies for risk management that are culturally and technically appropriate and accepted, and therefore sustainable.…”
Section: Co-production Approaches To Build Adaptive Capacity To Climate-change-related Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial research in Medellín focused on the development of co-produced solutions to monitor and mitigate landslide risk in informal communities at the urban-rural city edge (Smith et al 2020a(Smith et al , 2020b(Smith et al , 2021. The research took place in the Pinares de Oriente neighbourhood, within Comuna 8, one of the low-income districts located high above the city in the north-eastern sector, where largely self-built communities have grown on steep slopes.…”
Section: Research Phase 1: Initial Pilot Study Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research found that (1) community-based monitoring of landslide risk can be effective, but requires an ongoing and close link between the participating residents and the research team; (2) there is a need for local researchers and community leaders who are able to visit the area regularly and discuss the practicalities of data collection with the participants, as this provides 'a face' on the ground; (3) it is necessary to share with participants how the information is used and analysed across the involved national and international academic institutions to build trust; and (4) although the researchers and community members agreed upon the scale and ambition of the monitoring points, it proved to be challenging for community volunteers to cover all of these points on a regular basis, with some critical points receiving much lower attention than others, depending on the availability and interest of those undertaking the monitoring exercise (Smith et al 2020b). In terms of capacity building, rooted in the experiences and approach of the research project, the local NGO ConVivamos created a Hillside Neighbourhood School (Escuela de Barrios de Ladera) at the wider scale of Comuna 8, in collaboration with community leaders.…”
Section: Research Phase 1: Initial Pilot Study Communitymentioning
Traditional top-down strategies to reduce climate-change-related risks have often failed to produce tangible results in vulnerable urban areas of the Global South. Approaches based on the co-production of adaptation solutions between diverse stakeholders offer promising alternative strategies. This contribution draws on our experiences in growing informal and low-income urban areas in two Latin American cities, Medell�n (Colombia) and Puebla (Mexico). These communities lack adequate access to clean water and are exposed to risks related to increasingly frequent high-intensity rainfall events, making water management a key consideration for risk reduction. However, the factors driving insufficient water access and the perceptions of risks vary in each location, demonstrating the need for context-specific solutions. We explore how increasing community agency and co-creating knowledge for risk management between diverse stakeholders at a range of geographical scales can contribute to redressing existing social and environmental injustices, by identifying, implementing, and scaling up technically appropriate and culturally sustainable solutions aimed at reducing climate-change-related risks.
“…Landslide hazard is increasing year by year due to more intense and frequent rainfall as a consequence of climate change [1]. Additionally, secondary causes such as wildfires play an important role in promoting landslides [2].…”
Section: Project Overview Inform@risk 1project Background and Goalsmentioning
Worldwide, cities with mountainous areas struggle with an increasing landslide risk as a consequence of global warming and population growth, especially in low-income informal settlements. Landslide Early Warning Systems (LEWS) are an effective measure to quickly reduce these risks until long-term risk mitigation measures can be realized. To date however, LEWS have only rarely been implemented in informal settlements due to their high costs and complex operation. Based on modern Internet of Things (IoT) technologies such as micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) sensors and the LoRa (Long Range) communication protocol, the Inform@Risk research project is developing a cost-effective geosensor network specifically designed for use in a LEWS for informal settlements. It is currently being implemented in an informal settlement in the outskirts of Medellin, Colombia for the first time. The system, whose hardware and firmware is open source and can be replicated freely, consists of versatile LoRa sensor nodes which have a set of MEMS sensors (e.g., tilt sensor) on board and can be connected to various different sensors including a newly developed low cost subsurface sensor probe for the detection of ground movements and groundwater level measurements. Complemented with further innovative measurement systems such as the Continuous Shear Monitor (CSM) and a flexible data management and analysis system, the newly developed LEWS offers a good benefit-cost ratio and in the future can hopefully find application in other parts of the world.
Smart city approaches have tended to be top-down, techno-centric/corporate and expensive approaches which are promoted by large, global companies. Smart city narratives focus on their expected capacity to improve citizens’ quality of life. However, can technology-driven and municipally-led smart city initiatives address the issues faced by poor and vulnerable communities in urban and peri-urban areas? This paper explores key aspects of the implementation of smart city approaches in the Global South taking as a case study the Colombian city of Medellín, which has been recognized internationally for its social innovation and is considered a smart city by the Inter-American Development Bank. The paper draws on a local, national and international literature review; interviews with key local stakeholders involved in smart city initiatives; and an international workshop on smart cities and community data management organized by the authors in Medellín and bringing together three perspectives: academia, government and community. The paper provides a reflection on the concept of smart city, data management and citizen participation in smart city initiatives in Medellín, contrasting each of these with the literature. Our research found gaps between broader conceptualisations and community-oriented intentions in smart city initiatives in Medellín, as well as very low uptake and reported impact of such initiatives. We conclude that a redefinition of smart city approaches that may respond to the needs of the population while improving liveability is still urgently needed, and we set out a series of questions for an international research agenda on low-income community-oriented smart city research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.