2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0386(06)16010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 10 A Microsimulation Model for Pharmacare: Development, Analysis and Policy Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such models were initially developed within the discipline of economics (Orcutt et al 1986) and have today become very widely used by governments across the developed world for analysis of the fine-grained distributional effect of possible changes in government programs (Harding 1996;Gupta and Kapur 2000;Mitton et al 2000;Harding and Gupta 2007;Zaidi et al 2010). While most such models still assess the likely winners and losers from reforms in income tax and cash transfer programs (Immervoll et al 2006;Lloyd 2007), the past decade has also seen the rapid expansion of microsimulation models into other subject areas, such as health, housing and aged care (Harding and Gupta 2007;Brown et al 2004;Kapur and Gupta 2007;Xiong et al 2007). However, importantly, the overwhelming majority of these microsimulation models have been national models, constructed on top of national sample survey microdata and predicting the distributional effect of policy change for an entire country, rather than for a small region within a country.…”
Section: Small-area Data and Spatial Microsimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models were initially developed within the discipline of economics (Orcutt et al 1986) and have today become very widely used by governments across the developed world for analysis of the fine-grained distributional effect of possible changes in government programs (Harding 1996;Gupta and Kapur 2000;Mitton et al 2000;Harding and Gupta 2007;Zaidi et al 2010). While most such models still assess the likely winners and losers from reforms in income tax and cash transfer programs (Immervoll et al 2006;Lloyd 2007), the past decade has also seen the rapid expansion of microsimulation models into other subject areas, such as health, housing and aged care (Harding and Gupta 2007;Brown et al 2004;Kapur and Gupta 2007;Xiong et al 2007). However, importantly, the overwhelming majority of these microsimulation models have been national models, constructed on top of national sample survey microdata and predicting the distributional effect of policy change for an entire country, rather than for a small region within a country.…”
Section: Small-area Data and Spatial Microsimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%