Oceans 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2006.307093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel Coding for Underwater Acoustic Communication System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, − 1}, each different from the index. Define (11) where is the real constant to control the amplification of the differential variation. We choose = 0.5 in our optimization.…”
Section: Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, − 1}, each different from the index. Define (11) where is the real constant to control the amplification of the differential variation. We choose = 0.5 in our optimization.…”
Section: Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the researches are focus on coding schemes of RS codes, convolutional codes and concatenated codes [6][7]. Results on pioneering works of these codes have shown that the use of these coding schemes is practical, but not the best choice, as the development of effective channel coding schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, trellis coded modulation (TCM) was used together with single carrier transmission and equalization in [8]. Convolutional codes and Reed Solomon (RS) codes have been examined in [9] for underwater acoustic communication. In conjunction with spatial multiplexing, Turbo codes were used in [10] for a single-carrier underwater system with multiple transmitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%