2018 14th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wimob.2018.8589121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel Coding for Better QoS in LoRa Networks

Abstract: In the Internet of Things, Packet Delivery Ratio and Time on Air are two predominant characteristics for both applications and operators, especially while using transmissions over Low Power Wide Area Networks such as LoRa T M. Our channel coding approach aims to improve these Quality of Service characteristics for LoRaWAN T M networks. Our CCARR protocol uses Reed-Solomon FEC and structures successive frames into segments. A completion acknowledgements dynamically controls the amount of FEC overload. We estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the considered RFTs in the presence of errors, two different error distributions are supported in Sim-RFT: a uniform error distribution [28]- [57], and a burst error distribution [34]- [50]. These error distributions cover a comprehensive set of characteristics of LoRaWAN networks such as frame loss over distance [31], [33], [34], [37], [41], [51]- [53], different uses cases [31], [35], [54]- [57], mobile or stationary devices [33], [46], [49], [50], network capacity [54], and collisions [33], [53]. Frame loss burstiness may be due to channel effects [34], [36], mobility [34], [35], limited coverage [38], [40], [41], [44], or opportunistic coverage [42]- [44].…”
Section: Error Patterns and Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the considered RFTs in the presence of errors, two different error distributions are supported in Sim-RFT: a uniform error distribution [28]- [57], and a burst error distribution [34]- [50]. These error distributions cover a comprehensive set of characteristics of LoRaWAN networks such as frame loss over distance [31], [33], [34], [37], [41], [51]- [53], different uses cases [31], [35], [54]- [57], mobile or stationary devices [33], [46], [49], [50], network capacity [54], and collisions [33], [53]. Frame loss burstiness may be due to channel effects [34], [36], mobility [34], [35], limited coverage [38], [40], [41], [44], or opportunistic coverage [42]- [44].…”
Section: Error Patterns and Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper concludes that due to limited duty cycling and the harsh nature of the channel, benefits of employing the proposed coding scheme at the physical LoRa link are limited. In [16], a Reed-Solomon-based Forward Error Correction (FEC) is used to improve the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) in LoRaWAN networks. [17] investigates the use of rateless codes to improve LoRa communication range and reduce energy consumption.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCARR transmits encoded super-frames, involving application data and redundancy data (RS-frames). CCARR guarantees high packet delivery ratio (even 100%) over lossy channels [10]. Borkotoky et al propose two application-layer coding schemes -windowed and selective coding-for delay-intolerant LoRaWANs with minimum feedback.…”
Section: B Constraints and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%