2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504709112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing recruitment capacity in global fish stocks

Abstract: Marine fish and invertebrates are shifting their regional and global distributions in response to climate change, but it is unclear whether their productivity is being affected as well. Here we tested for timevarying trends in biological productivity parameters across 262 fish stocks of 127 species in 39 large marine ecosystems and high-seas areas (hereafter LMEs). This global meta-analysis revealed widespread changes in the relationship between spawning stock size and the production of juvenile offspring (rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
95
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(33 reference statements)
6
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While effective reduction and management of fishing effort can rebuild fish stocks to sustainable levels (Worm et al, ; Sumaila et al, ; Costello et al, ), climate change poses fundamental challenge to such measures (Cheung et al, ). Particularly, in addition to the top‐down effect of fishing, bottom‐up environmental factors such as temperature and primary production also play a significant role in determining global fish stock production (McOwen et al, ; Britten et al, ). Bottom‐up environmental factors are changing under climate change, consequently affecting fish stocks and fisheries production.…”
Section: The Global Ocean Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While effective reduction and management of fishing effort can rebuild fish stocks to sustainable levels (Worm et al, ; Sumaila et al, ; Costello et al, ), climate change poses fundamental challenge to such measures (Cheung et al, ). Particularly, in addition to the top‐down effect of fishing, bottom‐up environmental factors such as temperature and primary production also play a significant role in determining global fish stock production (McOwen et al, ; Britten et al, ). Bottom‐up environmental factors are changing under climate change, consequently affecting fish stocks and fisheries production.…”
Section: The Global Ocean Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many well‐managed fish populations are not recovering as expected (Neubauer, Jensen, Hutchings, & Baum, ; Szuwalski & Thorson, ), suggesting other causes have contributed to declines in stock productivity. This contention is supported by evidence that many fish populations are driven by unpredictable regime changes (Vert‐pre, Amoroso, Jensen, & Hilborn, ) and over time, the productivity of many fish stocks has been declining (Britten, Dowd, & Worm, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…fishery | fecundity | zooplankton | lag effect | recruitment T he ultimate combination of factors determining the absence or presence of large classes of recruits entering the fishery is still enigmatic after a century of research (1,2), in particular under climate change (3). The predictive power of useful relationships typically diminishes over time when the blend of influential abiotic and biotic drivers change (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high importance of getting a grip on the expected level of recruitment (REC) for quota decisions, one practical solution is to assume the same REC as in preceding years. Logically, this is a fragile approach as environmental conditions are per definition nonstationary (3). Although fully solving the "recruitment problem" seems unrealistic due to the chaotic nature of the multiple processes involved, the spawning stock biomass (SSB) can be regulated by humans through the degree of fishing intensity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%