2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01648.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing land use reduces soil CH4 uptake by altering biomass and activity but not composition of high‐affinity methanotrophs

Abstract: Forest ecosystems assimilate more CO 2 from the atmosphere and store more carbon in woody biomass than most nonforest ecosystems, indicating strong potential for afforestation to serve as a carbon management tool. However, converting grasslands to forests could affect ecosystem-atmosphere exchanges of other greenhouse gases, such as nitrous oxide and methane (CH 4 ), effects that are rarely considered. Here, we show that afforestation on a well-aerated grassland in Siberia reduces soil CH 4 uptake by a factor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methane uptake rates of our undisturbed soils were comparable to those reported for European and North American temperate forest soils (4,35,48,49). Here, traffic with heavy harvesting machines caused a large reduction (between 2 and 80%) in CH 4 consumption rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The methane uptake rates of our undisturbed soils were comparable to those reported for European and North American temperate forest soils (4,35,48,49). Here, traffic with heavy harvesting machines caused a large reduction (between 2 and 80%) in CH 4 consumption rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Afforested sites consumed more atmospheric CH 4 than the nonforested ones (25,27). In contrast to these results, afforestation of a boreal grassland led to reduced atmospheric CH 4 uptake and a reduction of the methanotrophic biomass (20).…”
Section: Downloaded Fromcontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Other soil samples were collected in Siberian grassland and in experimental afforestation plots maintained for 30 years under the influence of five tree species: Arolla pine (Pinus sibirica), Scots pine (Pinus silvestris), Norway spruce (Picea abies), birch (Betula fruticosa), and aspen (Populus tremula) (40,41). The soil samples were sieved (mesh size, Ͻ2 mm) and stored at 4°C for more than 2 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%