2003
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.10105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in urinary concentrations of total estrogen and pregnanediol in a female giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) from 1991 to 2000

Abstract: Total estrogen and pregnanediol concentrations in urine samples from one female giant panda were measured from 1991–2000. This female experienced her first estrus at the age of 5 years 3 months in 1991. From 1992 on, estrous behavior was observed every year between January and June, and the peak values of total estrogen ranged from 28.3 ng/ml in 1992 to 85.6 ng/ml in 1999. The female's estrus in 2000 was very weak, and she died in July 2000. She was artificially inseminated every year from 1994 to 1999, but no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interval was then followed by a distinctive 3-to 20-fold elevation that lasted another 28-63 days before declining to signal birth or the end of a non-parturient phase. A general biphasic progestagen pattern has been reported from earlier urinary monitoring studies of this species, but only in a few individuals (Hodges et al 1984, Chaudhuri et al 1988, Masui et al 1989, Monfort et al 1989, Mainka et al 1990, McGeehan et al 2002, Narushima et al 2003. The present study was important because of the increased confidence generated from simultaneously examining a large cohort of giant pandas, some of which were observed year to year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interval was then followed by a distinctive 3-to 20-fold elevation that lasted another 28-63 days before declining to signal birth or the end of a non-parturient phase. A general biphasic progestagen pattern has been reported from earlier urinary monitoring studies of this species, but only in a few individuals (Hodges et al 1984, Chaudhuri et al 1988, Masui et al 1989, Monfort et al 1989, Mainka et al 1990, McGeehan et al 2002, Narushima et al 2003. The present study was important because of the increased confidence generated from simultaneously examining a large cohort of giant pandas, some of which were observed year to year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…There has been little attention directed at understanding the prolonged luteal phase in pregnant versus non-pregnant individuals. Of ten reports on this topic, only three giant pandas in total have been monitored for urinary progestagen profiles from ovulation to parturition or through a non-parturient phase (sometimes referred to as 'pseudopregnancy'; Bonney et al 1982, Hodges et al 1984, Chaudhuri et al 1988, Masui et al 1989, Monfort et al 1989, McGeehan et al 2002, Narushima et al 2003, Dehnhard et al 2006, Steinman et al 2006, Spady et al 2007. In these cases, a secondary urinary progestagen rise has occurred 74-122 days after the end of oestrus (Steinman et al 2006) that has suggested a shift in hormonal source, perhaps related to nidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study performed at Ueno Zoological Garden, Tokyo, reported the dynamics of urinary PdG in a female giant panda that did not deliver for 10 consecutive years, from 1991 to 2000, despite being artificially inseminated each year [13]. The length of the period from ovulation to the end of pseudopregnancy or suspicious pseudopregnancy, in which the level of urinary PdG was elevated, was calculated as 8.8  2.3 weeks, which is shorter than the period of PdG elevation measured in the present study (16.5  1.9 weeks).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (PdG) is a metabolite of progesterone present in large amounts in the urine of pregnant animals [8]. Although many researchers have measured urinary PdG to monitor the reproductive status of the giant pandas [1,[9][10][11][12][13], urinary PdG is not thought to be a good indicator of pregnancy because the dynamics of urinary PdG are similar in pseudopregnant and pregnant giant pandas. However, because monitoring urinary PdG levels after estrus provides information on the timing of delivery and end of pseudopregnancy, a method for monitoring urinary PdG is needed for reproductive management of female giant pandas in captivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, another study of reproduction of the giant panda has been underway at Ueno Zoological Gardens, Tokyo, since 1972. They have succeeded in production of giant panda by artificial insemination (AI) [4]; however, they have also experienced unsuccessful reproduction in a female giant panda despite efforts to utilize AI for 10 years [5]. In these studies, they have also used urine to measure estrogen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%