1982
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4274(82)90125-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the minute ventilation of rats exposed to different concentrations of cigarette smoke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sprague-Dawley rats were chosen as the experimental animal because they have been used frequently in inhalation studies with complex mixtures, so there is a large amount of background data available in the scientific literature (e.g., Coggins et al, 1982aCoggins et al, , 1982b). The test system has been described in detail elsewhere .…”
Section: Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sprague-Dawley rats were chosen as the experimental animal because they have been used frequently in inhalation studies with complex mixtures, so there is a large amount of background data available in the scientific literature (e.g., Coggins et al, 1982aCoggins et al, , 1982b). The test system has been described in detail elsewhere .…”
Section: Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to DEE did not affect any of these respiratory parameters. Respiratory depression is typically seen with cigarette smoke-exposed rodents (Coggins et al, 1982) and is generally attributed to a reflex to sensory irritation of the trigeminal nerve or of lung C-fibers (Bonham et al, 2001).…”
Section: Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies used the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)/International Standards Organisation (ISO) standard of 35-ml puffs of 2-s duration, taken once per minute (ISO 1991). A few studies included radiolabeled markers of deposition, because minute ventilation is known to be markedly affected by smoke (Coggins, Musy, and Ventrone 1982). Many studies used nose-only smoking machines (Baumgartner and Coggins 1980; Henry et al 1985), others used whole-body exposures with known disadvantages (Langård and Nordhagen 1980).…”
Section: Cigarettes Smoking Conditions Smoke Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%