1962
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1962.tb00240.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the Intestinal Flora of Mice Following Administration of Bacterial Endotoxins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of Sanarelli in the 1920s also suggests that endotoxin-induced diarrhea was a possibility (30). There is very little in the literature regarding the effects of LPS on the gut until 1962, when a group ofJapanese workers showed that parenteral administration of LPS preparations to mice, led to proliferation ofgastrointestinal luminal bacteria (31). Subsequent work clearly established that this enhancement of bacterial growth was secondary to fluid exudation, since the bacterial growth could be suppressed by enteral administration of unabsorbable antibiotics like Neomycin (1 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Sanarelli in the 1920s also suggests that endotoxin-induced diarrhea was a possibility (30). There is very little in the literature regarding the effects of LPS on the gut until 1962, when a group ofJapanese workers showed that parenteral administration of LPS preparations to mice, led to proliferation ofgastrointestinal luminal bacteria (31). Subsequent work clearly established that this enhancement of bacterial growth was secondary to fluid exudation, since the bacterial growth could be suppressed by enteral administration of unabsorbable antibiotics like Neomycin (1 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little information on the role of intestinal CD14 and its interaction with LPS during acute bacterial diarrhea. A study conducted in the 1960s first demonstrated that parenteral administration of LPS in mice resulted in proliferation of bacteria in the intestinal lumen [35]. Subsequent work demonstrated that this effect was due to the availability of fluid that exuded into the gut lumen [36], likely to provide additional nutrients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%