1927
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-6963(27)90222-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the human face brought about by development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1936
1936
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The facial skeleton continues to grow throughout life and continues to do so at a differential rate. Differential growth throughout life leads to a change in shape of the mandible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 The facial skeleton continues to grow throughout life and continues to do so at a differential rate. Differential growth throughout life leads to a change in shape of the mandible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Hellman's work, based on several thousand measurements, led him to arrive at certain conclusions regarding facial growth. His primary assertion was that the facial skeleton continues to grow throughout life; as important, Hellman realized that the shape of the face continued to change throughout life, and termed this process "morphological differentiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Craniometric and anthropometric studies support the notion of marked craniofacial growth changes during the first 5 years. 10,11,12 Ohtshuki et al 13 reported greater cranial base growth during the first 5 postnatal years, especially during the first 2-3 years, than during the remaining postnatal years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harris, Gardner and Vaden (1999) found in a sample of 36 patients treated as adolescents that approximately 80% of the total increases in Cd-Gn, Cd-Go, and Go-Pg length during the posttreatment interval (mean = 14.4 years) occurred during the first 5.5 years after treatment. Similarly, the high increases in mandibular length (CdGn), ramus length (Cd-Go), and corpus length (Go-Pg) in the present study are likely to have occurred in the first few years after treatment as the result of parapubertal growth (Hellman 1927;Nanda 1955). The increase in corpus length was likely to be, in large part, a result of growth at the gonial process, whereas the increase in ramus length is assumed to be the result of growth of the condylar process (Nanda 1955).…”
Section: Mandiblementioning
confidence: 48%