Changes in the ‘Connectedness’ and Resilience of Paleolithic Societies in Mediterranean Ecosystems

Abstract

Human predator<prey relationships changed dramatically in the Mediterranean Basin between 250,000 and 9,000 years ago. Many of these changes can be linked to increases in Paleolithic human population densities. Small game species are particularly diagnostic of increases in human hunting pressure and are a major source of evidence for demographic change after 40 -45,000 years ago. Biomass-corrected data on prey choice also indicate increasing use of those species that possess higher reproductive efficiencies.Step-wise, apparently irreversible shifts in human predatory niche are apparent in the Mediterranean Basin, beginning with the earliest Upper Paleolithic in the east and spreading westward. Evidence of demographic pressure and greater use of resilient prey populations is followed by technological innovations to exploit these animals more efficiently. The zooarchaeological findings suggest that Middle and Lower Paleolithic reproductive units probably were not robust at the micropopulation scale, due to the rather narrow set of behavioral responses that characterized social groups at the time, and thus localized extinctions at the micropopulation level were likely to have been common. Upper Paleolithic groups were the quintessential colonizers and, in addition, uniquely good at holding on to habitat gained. Upper Paleolithic archaeological "cultures" had shorter histories of existence than those of earlier periods, but they were even more widespread geographically. The demographic robustness of the Upper Paleolithic systems may stem from wholesale strategies for evening-out or sharing risk and volatility in technology. Micropopulations were larger and often denser on landscapes, more connected via cooperative ties, and thus more robust.

Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere

“…Some experts argue that a genetic mutation or other major genetic change is required to explain the relatively sudden and widespread emergence of the suite of modern human behaviors (Klein 2013), which include symbolic inscriptions, lithic projectile point weapons, personal ornaments, rapid changes in tools and technologies, more highly structured settlements, and long-distance trade (Mellars 2005, Hill et al 2009, Nowell 2010. Others explain this based on the need to adapt to rapid environmental changes or heterogeneous environmental conditions (Mellars 2005, Stiner and Kuhn 2006, Potts 2012, to changes in social conditions conducive to social learning (Sterelny 2011), including demographic shifts toward higher population densities enabling greater accumulation of cultural information (Shennan 2001, Powell et al 2009, Derex et al 2013, the emergence of exchange-based economies (Sterelny 2014), increased intergroup conflict or cooperation (Mellars 2005, Stiner andKuhn 2006), and by other factors and combinations of factors (Powell et al 2009). …”

Innovation: an emerging focus from cells to societies

“…The authors develop a model to investigate the independent and interactive influences of population size and environment on cultural accumulation in the form of tools and technologies. They assume that innovation is primarily driven by environmental challenge, but that innovations are to some extent environmentspecific, meaning that innovations are potentially gained and lost when populations migrate or environments change [55,162,163]. However and importantly, those populations that construct their environments (e.g.…”

Resilience of small-scale societies&#8217; livelihoods: a framework for studying the transition from food gathering to food production

“…A way of inferring social networks from livelihood practices has been introduced by Stiner and Kuhn (2006). Their work shows that during the Late Paleolithic, the decrease in ungulates prey size, alongside changes in the mortality patterns, could be interpreted as the consequence of higher demographic pressure (Stiner et al 1999), which in turn forced a reorganization and intensification of social networks (Stiner and Kuhn 2006).…”