2011
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2011.25.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the age-at-death distribution in four low mortality countries: A nonparametric approach

Abstract: References 618Appendix 623 A1 From B-splines to P-splines 623 A2 The penalized likelihood function for P-splines 624 A3 Smoothing mortality data with P-splines 625 A4 Comparison between HMD life table age-at-death distributions and P-spline smoothed density functions for Japan 626Demographic Research: Volume 25, Article 19 Research ArticleChanges in the age-at-death distribution in four low mortality countries: A nonparametric approach Nadine Ouellette 1 Robert Bourbeau 2 AbstractSince the beginning of the twe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
73
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Indices of variability have been compared across populations to measure the rectangularity of the survival curve or degree of mortality compression for both human and and non-human populations (see for instance Eakin and Witten 1995;Edwards and Tuljapurkar 2005;Smits and Monden 2009;van Raalte et al 2011;Vaupel, Zhang and van Raalte 2011). They have also been employed above the modal age at death to examine whether old-age mortality is being compressed, or whether these deaths are shifting to higher ages (Brown et al 2012;Cheung et al 2005;Cheung and Robine 2007;Kannisto 2000;Ouellette and Bourbeau 2011;Thatcher et al 2010). The various indices of lifespan variation have been compared by Anand et al (2001); Cheung et al (2005); Kannisto (2000); Shkolnikov, Andreev and Begun (2003); Vaupel et al (2011) and Wilmoth and Horiuchi (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indices of variability have been compared across populations to measure the rectangularity of the survival curve or degree of mortality compression for both human and and non-human populations (see for instance Eakin and Witten 1995;Edwards and Tuljapurkar 2005;Smits and Monden 2009;van Raalte et al 2011;Vaupel, Zhang and van Raalte 2011). They have also been employed above the modal age at death to examine whether old-age mortality is being compressed, or whether these deaths are shifting to higher ages (Brown et al 2012;Cheung et al 2005;Cheung and Robine 2007;Kannisto 2000;Ouellette and Bourbeau 2011;Thatcher et al 2010). The various indices of lifespan variation have been compared by Anand et al (2001); Cheung et al (2005); Kannisto (2000); Shkolnikov, Andreev and Begun (2003); Vaupel et al (2011) and Wilmoth and Horiuchi (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modal age of the life-table distribution of deaths has been suggested as an alternative to life expectancy in studying longevity (Kannisto 2001;Cheung et al 2005;Cheung and Robine 2007;Canudas-Romo 2008Ouellette and Bourbeau 2011;Horiuchi et al 2013). Life expectancy for Japanese females was estimated to be 86.4 years in 2012 (HMD 2014); most of the deaths in this population, however, will occur 6 years later around the modal age at death at about age 92 (HMD 2014).…”
Section: History and Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the modal age at death has shown an accelerated pace of increase since the onset of the old-age mortality decline (Kannisto 2000;Wilmoth and Robine 2003;Canudas-Romo 2008). Since the beginning of the 21st century, this indicator has received increasing attention and has become a key indicator of lifespan, especially since longevity extension became determined by adult and old-age mortality (Kannisto 2000(Kannisto , 2001Bongaarts 2005;Cheung and Robine 2007;Canudas-Romo 2008Ouellette and Bourbeau 2011;Horiuchi et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%