2021
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in skin characteristics after using respiratory protective equipment (medical masks and respirators) in the COVID‐19 pandemic among healthcare workers

Abstract: BackgroundThe coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) outbreak has presented unique dermatologic challenges due to respiratory protective equipment (RPE)–related skin conditions.ObjectiveTo objectively evaluate the effects of RPE including medical masks and respirators on the skin barrier by measuring various physiological properties of the skin.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was designed. Twenty healthy healthcare workers were included in this study. Skin parameters including skin hydration, transepidermal water … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies were observational, with only one being an RCT, and included adults with a mean age between 29 and 46 years. Most had a majority female representation (ranging from 39% in Niikura, Fujishiro ( 24 ) to 90% in Han, Shin ( 25 )). Most studies compared HCWs wearing surgical masks or N95 respirators (n=16), and the remaining studies compared HCWs wearing surgical masks compared to KF94 or KF95 (n=1), FFP2 (n=3) or various respirator types (n=1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies were observational, with only one being an RCT, and included adults with a mean age between 29 and 46 years. Most had a majority female representation (ranging from 39% in Niikura, Fujishiro ( 24 ) to 90% in Han, Shin ( 25 )). Most studies compared HCWs wearing surgical masks or N95 respirators (n=16), and the remaining studies compared HCWs wearing surgical masks compared to KF94 or KF95 (n=1), FFP2 (n=3) or various respirator types (n=1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were conducted in several different countries (although the USA was the most represented [n=8]) and ranged widely in participant number (e.g. 20 participants in Han, Shin ( 25 ) compared to 20,614 in Sims, Maine ( 26 )) ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A warm and humid environment created from the continuous expiration into a confined space increases transepidermal water loss and skin pH, consequently altering the skin's susceptibility to allergens. 4 Furthermore, several allergens have been reported in each of the mask components (Table 1). 2,5 In our case, polyurethane/polyester sponge was the culprit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Okklusion Physikalische/chemische Irritation infolge gestörter Barrierefunktion [1, 3] durch Anstieg von ○ Temperatur (auch durch Ausatemluft) ○ Durchfeuchtung der Haut (auch durch Ausatemluft) ○ TEWL ○ Erythem ○Transientes Erythem (neurologisch mediiert durch Wärme/Druck) ○Persistierendes Erythem durch Inflammation ○ pH (folgend Dysbiose, Aktivierung von Serinproteasen und Ceramidase) ○ Sebumsekretion (auch außerhalb der von Masken bedeckten Zonen) Triggerung anlagebedingter subklinischer Gesichtsdermatosen …”
Section: Dauerhaftes Tragens Des Mund‐nasenschutzesunclassified