2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in non-fasting concentrations of blood lipids after a daily Chinese breakfast in overweight subjects without fasting hypertriglyceridemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
23
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we observed more substantial reductions in LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels in Chinese subjects with CHD at 2 h and 4 h after a daily breakfast [13,16], appearing to be greater than those reported in large-scale clinical studies conducted in other countries [14,15,17,18],although the potential cause remains uncertain. Additionally, it was proposed that non-HDL-C level may be a better prognostic factor than LDL-C level to evaluate the risk of future cardiovascular events [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, we observed more substantial reductions in LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels in Chinese subjects with CHD at 2 h and 4 h after a daily breakfast [13,16], appearing to be greater than those reported in large-scale clinical studies conducted in other countries [14,15,17,18],although the potential cause remains uncertain. Additionally, it was proposed that non-HDL-C level may be a better prognostic factor than LDL-C level to evaluate the risk of future cardiovascular events [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Indeed, it was found that the percent attainment of postprandial LDL-C or/and non-HDL-C was significantly higher than that of fasting values in the present study, suggesting that the fasting goals of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L and non-HDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L were indeed unsuitable for the evaluation of postprandial cholesterol control. ROC analysis has been used to identify the optimal cut-off point for the diagnosis of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia [16,28,29] but not for determining goals of LDL-C and non-HDL-C in the non-fasting state corresponding to the fasting goals. Because the non-fasting cut-off points acquired by ROC analysis corresponded to the fasting goals of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L and non-HDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L, the postprandial percent attainments were very similar to their respective fasting values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a drop in some nonfasting cholesterol parameters after a daily meal [10]. The maximal mean reduction in LDL-C or non-HDL-C 1-6 h after habitual food intake was only 0.2 mmol/L, which was considered insigni cant in a population from Copenhagen [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As we know that study about evaluating cardiovascular risk with non-fasting blood lipids for primary prevention in China is rare [21], especially about the comparison of fasting and non-fasting blood lipids in the same patients within a same day [22]. Furthermore, there was no study to compare the roles of two different risk assessment tools in risk strati cation in Chinese general subjects via fasting or non-fasting blood lipids after a daily meal in a same day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%