2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006gl026550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in moisture and energy fluxes due to agricultural land use and irrigation in the Indian Monsoon Belt

Abstract: [1] We present a conceptual synthesis of the impact that agricultural activity in India can have on land-atmosphere interactions through irrigation. We illustrate a ''bottom up'' approach to evaluate the effects of land use change on both physical processes and human vulnerability. We compared vapor fluxes (estimated evaporation and transpiration) from a pre-agricultural and a contemporary land cover and found that mean annual vapor fluxes have increased by 17% (340 km 3 ) with a 7% increase (117 km 3 ) in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
140
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
13
140
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These significant potential impacts of irrigation on temperature, clouds, precipitation, and related fluxes necessitate an appropriate representation of irrigation in coupled landatmosphere models. This need has been addressed via irrigation parameterizations in LSMs that largely fall into three types of schemes: (1) defined increases to soil moisture in one or more soil layers (Kueppers and Snyder, 2011;de Vrese et al, 2016), sometimes referred to as flood (Evans and Zaitchik, 2008); (2) the addition of water as pseudoprecipitation to mimic sprinkler systems (Ozdogan et al, 2010;Yilmaz et al, 2014); and (3) modifications to vapor fluxes as a proxy for increased evapotranspiration resulting from highly efficient (e.g., drip) irrigation (Douglas et al, 2006;Evans and Zaitchik, 2008). These schemes are generally dependent on parameter input datasets and user-defined thresholds, affording a degree of customization, but also introducing uncertainty and potential error.…”
Section: Irrigation Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These significant potential impacts of irrigation on temperature, clouds, precipitation, and related fluxes necessitate an appropriate representation of irrigation in coupled landatmosphere models. This need has been addressed via irrigation parameterizations in LSMs that largely fall into three types of schemes: (1) defined increases to soil moisture in one or more soil layers (Kueppers and Snyder, 2011;de Vrese et al, 2016), sometimes referred to as flood (Evans and Zaitchik, 2008); (2) the addition of water as pseudoprecipitation to mimic sprinkler systems (Ozdogan et al, 2010;Yilmaz et al, 2014); and (3) modifications to vapor fluxes as a proxy for increased evapotranspiration resulting from highly efficient (e.g., drip) irrigation (Douglas et al, 2006;Evans and Zaitchik, 2008). These schemes are generally dependent on parameter input datasets and user-defined thresholds, affording a degree of customization, but also introducing uncertainty and potential error.…”
Section: Irrigation Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigation consumes most of the freshwater exploited by the global human population (Douglas et al, 2006). According to statistics obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, about 2722 billion m 3 or 70 % of the total global anthropogenic water extraction was consumed by agricultural irrigation in 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in turn, irrigation significantly increases the regional moisture to the atmosphere, consequently increasing the regional precipitation [20]. On the other hand, irrigation plays a role in reducing the regional temperature and the daily temperature difference [21][22][23][24]. Thus, the irrigation area has rapidly increased in the past centuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%