2021
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in litter traits induced by vegetation restoration accelerate litter decomposition in Robinia pseudoacacia plantations

Abstract: The chemical traits of litter are among the most critical factors that affect its decomposition. During vegetation restoration of planted forests, increasing age of the planted species and succession of the understory species may lead to significant changes in litter traits. However, it is unclear how these changes occur and how they affect litter decomposition. Therefore, we studied the decomposition of litter from four Robinia pseudoacacia plantations in the Loess Plateau in China with stand ages of 10-43 ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon and nitrogen losses from leaf litter increased during vegetation restoration, while those from root litter showed the opposite trend; the older stand ages (45 Y) had the lowest carbon and nitrogen losses, which agrees with our second hypothesis. A previous study demonstrated that the rate of decomposition of R. pseudoacacia plantation litter increased during the revegetation process (Zhang et al, 2021), similar to our results. Litter N and P contents increased with restoration duration (Supplementary Table S1), which may have been beneficial for rapidly growing microbes and accelerating carbon and nitrogen losses (Xiao et al, 2019), as the effect of restoration duration on litter decomposition was more pronounced during the early stage.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carbon and nitrogen losses from leaf litter increased during vegetation restoration, while those from root litter showed the opposite trend; the older stand ages (45 Y) had the lowest carbon and nitrogen losses, which agrees with our second hypothesis. A previous study demonstrated that the rate of decomposition of R. pseudoacacia plantation litter increased during the revegetation process (Zhang et al, 2021), similar to our results. Litter N and P contents increased with restoration duration (Supplementary Table S1), which may have been beneficial for rapidly growing microbes and accelerating carbon and nitrogen losses (Xiao et al, 2019), as the effect of restoration duration on litter decomposition was more pronounced during the early stage.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Enzyme activities significantly varied during the decomposition of leaf litter and fine roots (Table 3; Figure 5). Previous studies have demonstrated that enzyme activities mediate the litter decomposition process (Fu et al, 2021;Li et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Li et al, 2022). Enzyme activities often have a positive effect on litter decomposition at the local scale (Zhong et al, 2017;Zheng et al, 2021).…”
Section: Relative Importance Of Influencing Factor On Litter C and N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have found positive [62,63] or negative [47,64] effects of vegetation restoration on fungal diversity. For example, the decrease in plant diversity in the sown treatments was followed by a decline in the diversity of plant litter and root exudates; a reduction in the heterogeneity of resources may induce a reduction in the fungal diversity [10,64]. On the contrary, some studies have shown that vegetation restoration can improve fungal diversity by increasing the enzyme activities and soil nutrients [65][66][67].…”
Section: Effects Of Vegetation Restoration On the Soil Fungal Communi...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Litter decomposition plays an important role in nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems (Wu et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022). Different qualities of litter inputs change the nutrient contents of soil (e.g., C, N, P, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%