2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in FIT values below the threshold of positivity and short-term risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia: Results from a population-based cancer screening program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data about IC incidence were available only for a subgroup of screenees and the information was updated only up to 2012, which did not allow to quantify the CRC risk over several rounds. Our results are however confirming the findings of previous studies9 showing a similar positive association of cumulative f-Hb with the risk of SD AN and of IC. Also, the IC rate observed in this subgroup is consistent with the estimates form previous reports in the areas covered by the study19 20…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Data about IC incidence were available only for a subgroup of screenees and the information was updated only up to 2012, which did not allow to quantify the CRC risk over several rounds. Our results are however confirming the findings of previous studies9 showing a similar positive association of cumulative f-Hb with the risk of SD AN and of IC. Also, the IC rate observed in this subgroup is consistent with the estimates form previous reports in the areas covered by the study19 20…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Their risk was still twice as high as compared with the subjects with a cumulative f-Hb in the range 15–19.9 µg/g. The cumulative AN risk was similar in the younger (50–59) as in the older (60–69) age group, while it was higher among men, as compared with women, as already reported in a previous analyses 8 9…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations