2008
DOI: 10.21236/ada479254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Espionage by Americans: 1947-2007

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critically, however, as the source had rather strong ties to the group planning the attack, he or she was not willing to reveal the information in full (Oleszkiewicz, ). This information management dilemma is backed up by research examining individuals on their way leaving violent extremist groups (Dalgaard‐Nielsen, ) and studies on insider spies (Herbig, ), showing that the incentive to be semicooperative with respect to sharing information is commonly linked to divided loyalties. Furthermore, evaluating human intelligence gathering techniques required developing novel measures of efficacy (Granhag, Oleszkiewicz, & Kleinman, ; Oleszkiewicz, ), capturing the objective outcomes of the interview (e.g., the amount of information that advances the interviewer's understanding of the case), as well as the source's subjective perceptions of the interaction (e.g., reading what information the interviewer was after).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, however, as the source had rather strong ties to the group planning the attack, he or she was not willing to reveal the information in full (Oleszkiewicz, ). This information management dilemma is backed up by research examining individuals on their way leaving violent extremist groups (Dalgaard‐Nielsen, ) and studies on insider spies (Herbig, ), showing that the incentive to be semicooperative with respect to sharing information is commonly linked to divided loyalties. Furthermore, evaluating human intelligence gathering techniques required developing novel measures of efficacy (Granhag, Oleszkiewicz, & Kleinman, ; Oleszkiewicz, ), capturing the objective outcomes of the interview (e.g., the amount of information that advances the interviewer's understanding of the case), as well as the source's subjective perceptions of the interaction (e.g., reading what information the interviewer was after).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information management paradigm has proven to work well in our past lab-based research , and in our field research (Oleszkiewicz, Granhag, & Kleinman, 2017). Importantly, the practical relevance of this paradigm is supported by research examining individuals on their way leaving violent extremist groups (Dalgaard-Nielsen, 2013) and studies on insider spies (Herbig, 2008), showing that the incentive to be semi-cooperative with respect to sharing information is commonly linked to divided loyalties. Furthermore, evaluating human intelligence gathering techniques require novel measures of efficacy (Oleszkiewicz, 2016).…”
Section: Past Research On the Scharff Techniquementioning
confidence: 92%
“…These models include physical behaviors that are indicators of adversarial intent (e.g. foreign travel, signs of wealth) [19], as well as variables related to motivation, personality, and emotion [20], [21], [22], [23]. While all these models are valuable, none incorporate all of the possible situational triggers, context variables and indicators.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%