Changes in EEG Spectrograms, Event-Related Potentials and Event-Related Desynchronization Induced by Relative Beta Training in ADHD Children

Kropotov, J.D.; Grin-Yatsenko, Vera A.; Пономарев, В. А.; Чутко, Л. С.; Yakovenko, E. A.; Is, Nikishena

doi:10.1300/j184v11n02_02

Cited by 20 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Note that three pairs of reports (i.e., Doehnert, Brandeis, Straub, Steinhausen, Kropotov et al [2005] and Kropotov et al [2007]) used the same participants; therefore, the 14 identified reports represent only 11 separate studies. Only one study included participants without ADHD (n = 26 healthy college students; 3 men and 23 women); none of the studies included participants with non-ADHD psychiatric conditions for clinical contrast purposes.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies subdivided their samples post hoc into "good" and "poor" performers as defined by participants who were relatively more or less successful on most neurofeedback trials (i.e., those reported by Doehnert et al, 2008;Drechsler et al, 2007;Kropotov et al, 2005Kropotov et al, , 2007. The latter study found differences pre-to post-theta/beta neurofeedback on event-related potentials for good performers but not poor performers, but no group differences on any EEG spectrum bands.…”

Section: Neurological Findingsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…In one of these studies, Kropotov et al (2007) conducted a before-after design (no control group) and found that children whom they identified as good performers on the neurofeedback procedure were rated as improved on measures of attention and hyperactivity, but there was no change in parent ratings for children whom they identified as poor performers. Using a randomly assigned waitlist control group, Heinrich et al (2004) found that when compared with a SCP neurofeedback group, the latter group improved on a German ADHD rating scale, but the control group did not.…”

Section: Behavioral Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Neurofeedback as a Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Practice

Willis

Weyandt

Lubiner

et al. 2011

Journal of Applied School Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Neurological Findingsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Behavioral Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Neurofeedback as a Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Practice

Willis

Weyandt

Lubiner

et al. 2011

Journal of Applied School Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It has already been used as a therapeutic method in various mental illnesses, such as depression (Putman, 2002), attention-deficit/hyperactivity (Fuchs et al, 2003;Rossiter, 2004;Strehl et al, 2006;Kropotov et al, 2007), obsessive compulsive disorder (Hammond, 2003), epilepsy (Kotchoubey et al, 2001), anxiety and affective disorders (Hammond, 2005). Moreover, some studies have confirmed its efficiency in weakening the neuropsychological traits of substance and alcohol dependence (Saxby and Peniston, 1995;Masterpasqua and Healey, 2003;Scott et al, 2005;Sokhadze et al, 2008).…”

Section: Future Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resting-state Abnormalities in Heroin-dependent Individuals

Pandria

Kovatsi

Vivas³

et al. 2018

Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version -refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher's website. TakedownIf you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. AbstractDrug addiction is a major health problem worldwide. Recent neuroimaging studies have shed light into the underlying mechanisms of drug addiction as well as its consequences to the human brain. The most vulnerable, to heroin addiction, brain regions have been reported to be specific regions in the prefrontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes, as well as, some subcortical regions.The brain regions involvedare linked with reward, motivation/drive, memory/learning, inhibition as well as emotional control andseem to form circuitsthat interact with each other. So, along with neuroimaging studies, recent advances in resting-state dynamics might allow further assessments upon the multilayer complexity of addiction. In the current manuscript, we comprehensively reviewand discuss all the existing resting-state neuroimaging findings classified into three overlapping and interconnected groups: functional connectivity alterations, structural deficits and abnormal topological properties. Moreover, behavioral traits of heroin-addicted individuals as well as the limitations of the currently available studies are also reviewed. Finally, in need of a contemporary therapya multimodal therapeutic approach is suggested using classical treatment practices along with current neurotechonologies, such as neurofeedback and goal-oriented video-games Keywords:Heroin addiction, resting-state, functional and structural connectivity, small-world properties, behavioral traits of heroin-dependent individuals. Radial Diffusivity (RD) 5 Drug addiction or substance dependence (Koob and Le Moal, 2005)is defined as a multifaceted neuropsychiatric disorder resulting from complex interactions between neurobiological, environmental, genetic and pharmacological variables (Sutherland et al., 2012).It affects both cognitive as well as emotional processes . Furthermore, the compulsive seeking and taking of the drug despite the negative consequences, (including downward social mobility (Denier et al., 2013b)), constitutes its behavioral phenotype (Volkow ...

show abstract

“…According to Kropotov et al (2007), neurofeedback protocols were created when it was observed that children with ADHD tend to have a slowing of EEG rhythms. It was observed that theta brainwaves (4-8 Hz) were enhanced and that beta brainwaves (16-20 Hz) were reduced in people with ADHD.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Neurofeedback Help Reduce Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

2010

Journal of Neurotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Neurofeedback is an alternative treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but its efficacy is unknown. This narrative review examines rigorous studies conducted utilizing neurofeedback as a treatment for ADHD.Methods: Studies were located by searching the Web of Science and PsycINFO databases with the keywords ADHD or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder AND neurofeedback or EEG biofeedback or electroencephalogram biofeedback. Located studies were chosen for initial review if they met the following criteria: (a) randomized controlled trial or quasi-experiment, (b) ADHD diagnosis based on DSM criteria, (c) published at any time prior to March 2010, (d) English language, and (e) published in a peer-reviewed journal. Participants included children, adolescents, and adults diagnosed with ADHD.Results: Twelve articles reporting 9 different studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. All 9 studies produced results that indicated significant improvements on either tests scores or behavioral conduct for individuals who were treated with neurofeedback for ADHD. Alternative treatments also demonstrated effectiveness.Conclusion: Neurofeedback may be an effective treatment for ADHD. Future research is needed with larger sample sizes, comparing the efficacy of neurofeedback with the efficacy of other ADHD treatments and comparing different neurofeedback protocols.

show abstract

Changes in EEG Spectrograms, Event-Related Potentials and Event-Related Desynchronization Induced by Relative Beta Training in ADHD Children

Cited by 20 publications

References 29 publications

Neurofeedback as a Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Practice

Neurofeedback as a Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Practice

Resting-state Abnormalities in Heroin-dependent Individuals

Does Neurofeedback Help Reduce Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About