2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in condylar and joint disc positions after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fang et al [18] analyzed the outcome of 24 patients with Class III malocclusion undergoing orthognathic surgery. This study used a very thorough methodology including clinical inspection, imaging with lateral cephalometric radiographs and MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fang et al [18] analyzed the outcome of 24 patients with Class III malocclusion undergoing orthognathic surgery. This study used a very thorough methodology including clinical inspection, imaging with lateral cephalometric radiographs and MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang et al [18] führten an 24 Klasse-III-Patienten, bei denen eine Umstellungsosteotomie erfolgte, eine Nachuntersuchung durch. Neben der klinischen Inspektion lagen Fernröntgenseitenbilder des Schädels (FRS) und MRT-Bilder der Patienten vor.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…6,7 Many other studies have reported on postoperative condylar changes as well. [8][9][10] For assessment of condylar remodeling, several CBCT-based analysis methods have already been introduced. 11,12 Carvalho et al 13 evaluated 3D changes of location in the ramus, condylar, and mental region in patients who had received mandibular advancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mandible or bi maxillary surgery could modify the condylar position and be a factor for CR; in mandible surgery, statistical differences were not observed between the pre-surgical and post-surgical position of condyle (Ueki et al, 2002;Fang et al, 2009;Hackney et al, 1989; but this difference could be a clinical significance in the postoperative condition. On the other hand, Baek et al (2006) showed that in asymmetric movement (using sagittal split ramus osteotomy) the condylar position was the same after and before of surgery but with differences in inclination of condylar head of major and minor movement; this situation can be an explanation for different load on the condylar head and consecutively bone reabsorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%