2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in biofilm architecture with addition of membrane fouling reducer in a membrane bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It results in severe performance loss, modifies membrane surface properties and demands costly periodic cleaning or membrane replacement (8,25). Many studies have been focused on the alleviation of membrane fouling, for example, by backwashing, aeration, intermittent suction, module modification, addition of an inorganic coagulant and addition of a membrane fouling reducer (1,13). Chlorine is the most frequently applied agent in the biofouling control, but its destructive effect on certain membrane material, especially on polyamide reverse osmosis (RO) membrane due to the residual concentration, have already been reported (31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It results in severe performance loss, modifies membrane surface properties and demands costly periodic cleaning or membrane replacement (8,25). Many studies have been focused on the alleviation of membrane fouling, for example, by backwashing, aeration, intermittent suction, module modification, addition of an inorganic coagulant and addition of a membrane fouling reducer (1,13). Chlorine is the most frequently applied agent in the biofouling control, but its destructive effect on certain membrane material, especially on polyamide reverse osmosis (RO) membrane due to the residual concentration, have already been reported (31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, higher zeta potential values (À0.86 ± 1.07 mV) of activated sludge were measured in the MBR-G than those in the CMBR (À11.41 ± 5.06 mV), which demonstrated the negative surface charge of the microbial flocs was reduced or neutralized by Gemfloc Ò . Subsequently, the flocs could attach to each other and promote the production of larger flocs through the charge neutralization mechanism [29]. Ji et al [14] also reported similar results that the charge neutrality was responsible for enhancing flocculation ability of sludge flocs when adding PAM-MGMS into the MBR.…”
Section: Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (Mlss) Concentration Mixed LImentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On contrary, lower membrane fouling propensity of the MBR-G was due to formation of more porous and permeable cake layer caused by the deposition of larger and looser sludge flocs on membrane surface [16]. Previous studies have suggested that SMP induces internal fouling and decreases filterability since SMP can not only block membrane pores, but also block the pores and spaces between particles in the cake layer [29,[43][44][45]. Moreover, SMP C possessing partially hydrophilic nature could cause irreversible fouling by forming a thin gel layer on membrane compared to SMP P [6,[46][47][48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This helps in the enhancement of mass transfer efficiency significantly. However, irrespective of advantages such as easy scale up, high throughput etc., the fouling of polymeric membrane remains a major problem, which reduces productivity and increases maintenance and operating costs [13]. Particularly when the carries has to undergo different chemical reaction to immobilize the enzyme, this may result in the reduction of pore size and enhance the fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%