2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9469.00084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changepoint Analysis as a Method for Isotonic Inference

Abstract: Concavity and sigmoidicity hypotheses are developed as a natural extension of the simple ordered hypothesis in normal means. Those hypotheses give reasonable shape constraints for obtaining a smooth response curve in the non-parametric input±output analysis. The slope change and in¯ection point models are introduced correspondingly as the corners of the polyhedral cones de®ned by those isotonic hypotheses. Then a maximal contrast type test is derived systematically as the likelihood ratio test for each of thos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the model is a typical example of the monotone hypothesis satisfying 1 . On the contrary, every monotone contrast = ( 1 , ⋯ , ) ′ , ′ = 0, 1 ≤ ⋯ ≤ , = (1, ⋯ ,1) ′ can be expressed by a unique and positive linear combination of step change-point contrasts ( − , ⋯ , − , , ⋯ , ) with the first elements − and the last − elements , = 1, … , − 1,thus suggesting a close relationship between the monotone hypothesis and the step change-point model (Hirotsu and Marumo, 2002). The null hypotheses 0 (1) and ∆ (5) are of course equivalent.…”
Section: Model and Basic Ideamentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that the model is a typical example of the monotone hypothesis satisfying 1 . On the contrary, every monotone contrast = ( 1 , ⋯ , ) ′ , ′ = 0, 1 ≤ ⋯ ≤ , = (1, ⋯ ,1) ′ can be expressed by a unique and positive linear combination of step change-point contrasts ( − , ⋯ , − , , ⋯ , ) with the first elements − and the last − elements , = 1, … , − 1,thus suggesting a close relationship between the monotone hypothesis and the step change-point model (Hirotsu and Marumo, 2002). The null hypotheses 0 (1) and ∆ (5) are of course equivalent.…”
Section: Model and Basic Ideamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, we consider here a general case of unequal spacing of events and denote the time or location of the th event by . Then, the convexity hypothesis was introduced in Hirotsu and Marumo (2002) as 1 : * ′ ≥ 0, with at least one inequality strong,…”
Section: Model and Basic Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, (3) defines a − 1 edges of the convex cone defined by the simple ordered alternative (1); see [24]. For other extensions, including tree-structured, star-shaped, unimodality, and symmetry models, the reader is referred to [3] and [43].…”
Section: Various Extensions Of the Monotone Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Worsley (1986) demonstrated that in a change point problem, the computational time for the distribution of the maximum could be reduced using the Markov property among statistics (see also Kuriki et al 2002, Hirotsu andMarumo 2002, andreferences therein). In this paper, we develop a similar computation technique by taking advantage of the Markov structure among scan statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%