2013
DOI: 10.1108/jaoc-07-2011-0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change within institutional theory: towards a framework of coping with change

Abstract: PurposeIn accounting literature, there is a strand of thought that is founded on the old institutional economics. One of the problems is that institutional theory can demonstrate resistance to change, not the formation of change. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to theory formation, in particular to enrich the institutional framework for understanding change, by showing how medical specialists in hospitals, in particular urologists, shape change processes in organizations as reflected in behavioral r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the implementation of managerial reforms, the majority of clinicians considered managerial activities as timeconsuming, bureaucratic procedures focused on costs and far from being clinically oriented and useful to clinicians' primary role of care delivery (Bourn & Ezzamel, 1986b;Kralewski, Dowd, & Kaissi, 2005;Lawrence, 1999). Due to the perceived low benefits in terms of clinical performance, clinicians frequently carried out their managerial duties with little attention, and did not integrate the use of AISs in their decision-making processes (Börner & Verstegen, 2013;Kurunmaki et al, 2003;Lapsley, 2007;Nyland & Pettersen, 2004). They also struggled against the introduction of control and the implementation of AISs in HCOs and reduced the impact of changes in the healthcare sector (Bourn & Ezzamel, 1986a, 1986bGuven Uslu & Conrad, 2008;Jacobs, 1995;Jones, 2002;Kurunmaki, 1999aKurunmaki, , 1999bKurunmaki et al, 2003;Notman et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since the implementation of managerial reforms, the majority of clinicians considered managerial activities as timeconsuming, bureaucratic procedures focused on costs and far from being clinically oriented and useful to clinicians' primary role of care delivery (Bourn & Ezzamel, 1986b;Kralewski, Dowd, & Kaissi, 2005;Lawrence, 1999). Due to the perceived low benefits in terms of clinical performance, clinicians frequently carried out their managerial duties with little attention, and did not integrate the use of AISs in their decision-making processes (Börner & Verstegen, 2013;Kurunmaki et al, 2003;Lapsley, 2007;Nyland & Pettersen, 2004). They also struggled against the introduction of control and the implementation of AISs in HCOs and reduced the impact of changes in the healthcare sector (Bourn & Ezzamel, 1986a, 1986bGuven Uslu & Conrad, 2008;Jacobs, 1995;Jones, 2002;Kurunmaki, 1999aKurunmaki, , 1999bKurunmaki et al, 2003;Notman et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominance of clinicians' professional experience in their decision-making processes enhanced by their professional culture exacerbated their negative approach toward AISs (Elina, Juhani, & Tiina, 2006;Kastberg & Siverbo, 2016;Notman et al, 1987). In this sense, clinicians did not understand the potentialities of AISs for strategic purposes (Carlström, 2012;Elina et al, 2006), although they were required to perform both clinical and managerial activities (Börner & Verstegen, 2013;Forbes et al, 2004;Fulop, 2012;Kippist & Fitzgerald, 2009;Kurunmaki et al, 2003;Kurunmaki, 2004), thus becoming doctor-managers (Coombs, 1987). The medical education system is one of the causes of the negative approach of clinicians to AISs (Forbes et al, 2004;Kippist & Fitzgerald, 2009).…”
Section: Clinicians' Education and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on OIE, Burns and Scapens (2000) have developed a framework to study the processes of change in management accounting, widely used for more than 15 years (Bogt, 2008;Bogt & Scapens, 2012;Börner & Verstegen, 2013;Busco & Scapens, 2011;Rautiainen & Scapens, 2013;Ribeiro & Scapens, 2006;Siti-Nabiha & Scapens, 2005;Van der Steen, 2009, 2011Youssef, 2013).…”
Section: An Extended Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%