Change Partisans Can Believe In: Policy Change, Cues, and Partisan Beliefs

Hahm, Hyeonho

doi:10.15617/psc.2022.2.28.1.35

psc

2022

DOI: 10.15617/psc.2022.2.28.1.35

|View full text |Cite

Change Partisans Can Believe In: Policy Change, Cues, and Partisan Beliefs

Hyeonho Hahm¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent0

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…See alsoHahm (2016) that emphasizes the role of institutional configurations that influence partisanship both at the mass and elite levels.9 The number of allocation tasks falls well within the conventional range of conjoint experiments or related vignette designs(Bansak et al 2021). …”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

Divided We Unite: The Nature of Partyism and the Role of Coalition Partnership in Europe

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlighting the strength of “partyism” in many democracies, recent scholarship pays keen attention to increasing hostility and distrust among citizens across party lines, known as affective polarization. By combining a conjoint analysis with decision-making games such as dictator and trust games, we design a novel survey experiment to systematically estimate and compare the strength of the partisan divide relative to other social divides across 25 European democracies. This design also allows us to investigate how the two components of affective polarization, in-group favoritism and out-group derogation, are moderated by the way parties interact with each other. We first find dominance of the partisan divide compared to other social divides that constitute traditional cleavages such as social class and religion. Second, we show that affective polarization in Europe is not primarily driven by out-group animus. Finally, we demonstrate that coalition partnership lessens affective polarization by reducing both in-group and out-group biases.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 92%

Divided We Unite: The Nature of Partyism and the Role of Coalition Partnership in Europe

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Change Partisans Can Believe In: Policy Change, Cues, and Partisan Beliefs

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Divided We Unite: The Nature of Partyism and the Role of Coalition Partnership in Europe

Divided We Unite: The Nature of Partyism and the Role of Coalition Partnership in Europe

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About