2012
DOI: 10.3189/2012aog61a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in snow strength caused by rain

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Rain-on-snow events can cause wet snow avalanches. Laboratory experiments were carried out to investigate the change in snow strength with increasing water content through rainwater percolation. Snowpack was artificially prepared consisting of a thin ice layer and fine compacted snow, and rainfall (2 mm h -1 ) was artificially applied 22-25.5 and 49-52 hours after the snowpack was formed.Snow hardness was measured with a push-pull force gauge to indicate the snow strength before and after each rain-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water ponding process is generally considered to be an important factor in wet snow avalanche formation [e.g., Kattelmann, 1984;Fierz and Föhn, 1994;Mitterer et al, 2011;Takeuchi and Hirashima, 2013], and the presence of capillary barriers has been statistically linked to wet snow avalanche activity [Baggi and Schweizer, 2009]. Based on field experiments, it is generally considered that snow strength is strongly reduced once volumetric liquid water content (LWC) exceeds 5-7% [Brun and Rey, 1987;Bhutiyani, 1996;Yamanoi and Endo, 2002;Ito et al, 2012]. As the typical LWC of snow in the absence of gradients in capillary suction is below this value [Coléou and Lesaffre, 1998;Heilig et al, 2015], ponding inside the snow cover seems to be an important prerequisite to reduce the stability of a wet snowpack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water ponding process is generally considered to be an important factor in wet snow avalanche formation [e.g., Kattelmann, 1984;Fierz and Föhn, 1994;Mitterer et al, 2011;Takeuchi and Hirashima, 2013], and the presence of capillary barriers has been statistically linked to wet snow avalanche activity [Baggi and Schweizer, 2009]. Based on field experiments, it is generally considered that snow strength is strongly reduced once volumetric liquid water content (LWC) exceeds 5-7% [Brun and Rey, 1987;Bhutiyani, 1996;Yamanoi and Endo, 2002;Ito et al, 2012]. As the typical LWC of snow in the absence of gradients in capillary suction is below this value [Coléou and Lesaffre, 1998;Heilig et al, 2015], ponding inside the snow cover seems to be an important prerequisite to reduce the stability of a wet snowpack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, grain growth and subsequent changes in pore sizes and pore size distribution under wet conditions decrease snow strength (Wakahama, 1968;Raymond and Tsushima, 1979;Colbeck, 1983;Brun and Ray, 1987;Marsh, 1987;Brun et al, 1989;Lehning et al, 2002;Yamanoi and Endo, 2002;Ito et al, 2012) and can lead to wet snow avalanches (Kattelmann, 1984;Fierz and Föhn, 1994;Baggi and Schweizer, 2008;Mitterer et al, 2011;Mitterer and Schweizer, 2013;Takeuchi and Hirashima, 2013;Wever et al, 2016a). Liquid water movement through the snowpack also controls the lag between rain events or snowmelt and water arrival at the snow base.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of stability, the presence of liquid water in the starting zone along with isothermal conditions is necessary to trigger a wet snow avalanche (Schweizer et al, 2015;Fierz and Föhn, 1994;Mitterer et al, 2013). More specifically, it was shown that the increase in LWC to 5%-7% will considerably decrease the cohesive forces in snow (Brun, 1989;Ito et al, 2012). Gravitational forces dominate infiltration (Waldner et al, 2004;Techel and Pielmeier, 2011), leading to rapid changes in grain size and shape (Brun, 1989) and density (Jordan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Lwc In Snow a Context For Snow Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%