2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenging DNA: Assessment of a range of genotyping approaches for highly degraded forensic samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mini-STRs and SNPs showed considerable increases in loci retrieval across all input amounts <1 ng compared to STRs. These results support previous studies demonstrating the enhanced performance and sensitivity of the AmpFlSTR® MiniFiler™ amplification kit [20,21] and SNP genotyping [2,13,15,22] for typing degraded samples. This may be attributed to reduced amplicon size, improved kit chemistry, genotyping platforms or a combination of all factors.…”
Section: Mixturessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mini-STRs and SNPs showed considerable increases in loci retrieval across all input amounts <1 ng compared to STRs. These results support previous studies demonstrating the enhanced performance and sensitivity of the AmpFlSTR® MiniFiler™ amplification kit [20,21] and SNP genotyping [2,13,15,22] for typing degraded samples. This may be attributed to reduced amplicon size, improved kit chemistry, genotyping platforms or a combination of all factors.…”
Section: Mixturessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…DNA typing using industry standard short tandem repeats (STRs) often becomes the principle means of identification [1]. DNA becomes progressively more fragmented as biological tissue degrades and this results in a decreasing ability to gain a complete STR profile [2]. The successful genotyping of samples exhibiting very high levels of DNA degradation can be further complicated by the availability of only minute quantities of material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the amplicon sizes of STR-based markers range from approximately 100-400 bp. In highly degraded samples, target amplicons are usually less than 200 bp in length [9][10][11]; thus, some routinely configured loci will not be typeable. Second, artifacts, such as stutter peaks, can add ambiguity to mixture analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the number of applications for DNA technology expands, inevitable backlogs have occurred due to increasing sample loads. Factors such as time lapse between the incident and sample recovery, exposure to external elements, and storage conditions may all result in sample degradation [4][5][6]. Hence, it is critical to be able to efficiently recover and reliably analyze the evidence collected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%