Challenges of SERS technology as a non-nucleic acid or -antigen detection method for SARS-CoV-2 virus and its variants

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant burden since December 2019 that has negatively impacted the global economy owing to the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is fast-transmitting and highly contagious. Efforts have been taken to minimize the impact through strict screening measures in country borders in order to isolate potential virus carriers. Effective fast-screening methods are thus needed to identify infected individuals. The standard diagnostic methods for screening SARS-CoV-2 virus have always been to perform nucleic acid-based and serological tests. However, with each having drawbacks on producing false results at very early or later stage after symptoms onset, supplementary techniques are needed to back up these tests. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) as a detection technique has continuously advanced throughout the years in terms of sensitivity and capability to detect ultralow concentration of analytes ranging from single molecule to pathogens, to present as a highly potential alternative to known sensing methods. SERS technology as a candidate for an alternative and supplementary diagnostic method for the viral envelope of SARS-CoV-2 virus is presented, comparing its pros and cons to the standard methods and what other aspects it could offer that the other methods are not capable of. Factors that contribute to the detection effectivity of SERS is also discussed to show the advantages and limitations of this technique. Despite its promising capabilities, challenges like sources of SARS-CoV-2 virus and its variations, reliable SERS spectra, mass production of SERS-active substrates, and compliance to regulations for wide-scale testing scenario are highlighted.

Detection of COVID-19 Virus on Surfaces Using Photonics: Challenges and Perspectives

“…Additionally, detection of COVID-19 requires collecting samples from patients, isolation, and washing before detection, and it also consumes time. Therefore, it is important to consider the following factors while detecting analytes with SERS techniques: nanostructure geometry, substrate design, viral sizes, wavelength, hot spot generation, laser type, and power [ 85 ]. Table 2 shows an outcome analysis of studies on the diagnosis of coronaviruses based on laser techniques.…”

Rapid field determination of SARS-CoV-2 by a colorimetric and fluorescent dual-functional lateral flow immunoassay biosensor

“…Antibody detection is not suitable for the detection of asymptomatic patients and patients with early infection. Rapid antigen detection (RAD) is a type of POCT for specific antigens based on transverse flow assay (LFIA), which not only detects antigens in the early stages of infection, but also can be performed in a short period of time in the field [12] , [13] . Notably, selection of appropriate antigens is the key to rapid antigen detection of SARS-CoV-2.…”

Clinical Application of the Novel Cell-Based Biosensor for the Ultra-Rapid Detection of the SARS-CoV-2 S1 Spike Protein Antigen: A Practical Approach

“…The interest in screening individuals for COVID-19 infection in point-of-care (POC) settings is concomitant with the wide vaccination against the virus [6]. Although nucleic acid-based tests are considered the golden standard for SARS-CoV-2, they are prone to false-negative or even contradictory results, especially before or at symptom onset [7][8][9]. In the context of immunological assays, antigen-detecting methods are advantageous over serology-based ones, since no prior seroconversion (usually peaking around one to two weeks after the onset of symptoms) is required [10,11].…”