2021
DOI: 10.15497/rda00063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges of Curating for Reproducible and FAIR Research Output

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As funding to support the reusability of software is lacking, the main responsibility of making research software FAIR falls on the researchers developing the software since they may receive only limited support to assist them in this effort. Our proposed guidelines, while crucial for enhancing software reusability, may impose an additional burden on these researchers who already grapple with significant challenges during the software development process [16][17][18] . To address this concern and ensure the FAIR-BioRS guidelines are easily accessible and widely embraced by researchers, we have developed a workflow to streamline the process of implementing the FAIR-BioRS guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As funding to support the reusability of software is lacking, the main responsibility of making research software FAIR falls on the researchers developing the software since they may receive only limited support to assist them in this effort. Our proposed guidelines, while crucial for enhancing software reusability, may impose an additional burden on these researchers who already grapple with significant challenges during the software development process [16][17][18] . To address this concern and ensure the FAIR-BioRS guidelines are easily accessible and widely embraced by researchers, we have developed a workflow to streamline the process of implementing the FAIR-BioRS guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that funding to support the reusability of software is lacking, the responsibility of making research software FAIR falls on the researchers developing the software. Our proposed guidelines can thus add an additional burden on these researchers who are already facing significant challenges when developing their software [13][14][15] . To address this concern and ensure the FAIR-BioRS guidelines are easily accessible and widely embraced by researchers, we have developed a user-support tool to streamline the process of implementing the FAIR-BioRS guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%