2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02463-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Biomedical Research Software FAIR: Actionable Step-by-step Guidelines with a User-support Tool

Bhavesh Patel,
Sanjay Soundarajan,
Hervé Ménager
et al.

Abstract: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) guiding principles tailored for research software have been proposed by the FAIR for Research Software (FAIR4RS) Working Group. They provide a foundation for optimizing the reuse of research software. The FAIR4RS principles are, however, aspirational and do not provide practical instructions to the researchers. To fill this gap, we propose in this work the first actionable step-by-step guidelines for biomedical researchers to make their research software… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may also include a link to the research article, citation instructions and a mention of the software license. A recently described set of recommendations for documenting software describes further measures that data analysts could use to enhance their code documentation [ 136 ].…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also include a link to the research article, citation instructions and a mention of the software license. A recently described set of recommendations for documenting software describes further measures that data analysts could use to enhance their code documentation [ 136 ].…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also include a link to the research article, citation instructions and a mention of the software license. A recently described set of recommendations for documenting software describes further measures that data analysts could use to enhance their code documentation [137].…”
Section: Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%