2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in the Analysis of Rural Populations in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disadvantages continue when considering the study and measurement of these populations to motivate appropriate policies. Demographers have long acknowledged the instability of measures concerning rural populations due to sparsity [32], often methodologically mitigated by substituting statistics from larger areas with similar population characteristics, making trends observed in specific rural areas, in fact, synthetic [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages continue when considering the study and measurement of these populations to motivate appropriate policies. Demographers have long acknowledged the instability of measures concerning rural populations due to sparsity [32], often methodologically mitigated by substituting statistics from larger areas with similar population characteristics, making trends observed in specific rural areas, in fact, synthetic [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Small area data are more challenging to work with than are larger-scale data because of changing boundaries, lack of historical patterns of change to serve as a basis for estimation, reliability issues, and location-specific factors that can greatly affect calculations. 10,11 The team encountered many of these issues during the pilot project. Several main challenges emerged throughout the process, including during geocoding and assessing aggregation needs.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small area analyses face a number of unique challenges not commonly encountered at larger geographic scales: (1) the boundaries of small areas often change over time making timeseries analyses challenging; (2) many types of data, especially those covering more detailed population characteristics, are not tabulated for smaller areas, necessitating the use of proxy variables; (3) because of a paucity of data, there are often no discernible past patterns of change that can serve as a basis for estimation or projection, which may require the application of model rates based on areas for which data are available but which may not be directly comparable; (4) even when data are available for small areas, they may be less reliable because of smaller sample sizes and greater sampling variability; and (5) location-specific factors such as institutional populations, seasonal populations, facility closings, or changes in zoning have a greater impact on population changes in small areas (Smith and Morrison, 2005;Murdock et al, 2012). Because of these challenges, population estimates and projections for small areas necessitate different sets of tools than those applied for larger areas such as states and nations.…”
Section: Smallnessmentioning
confidence: 99%