2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14757-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Object Detection Under Rainy Weather Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, the visibility and background attenuation of the object has been taken into account. Weather can significantly degrade detection for some sensors [ 55 , 56 ]. Three different effects can occur: reduction of visibility, particles appearing in the image, and, in the case of optical sensors, particles on the detector can obscure or blur regions.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, the visibility and background attenuation of the object has been taken into account. Weather can significantly degrade detection for some sensors [ 55 , 56 ]. Three different effects can occur: reduction of visibility, particles appearing in the image, and, in the case of optical sensors, particles on the detector can obscure or blur regions.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 90 ], a mathematical model is presented to test wet snowfall output; the analysis shows that radar output has a similar effect on snowfall to that of rainfall. Although radar performance in precipitate surroundings has been observed to degrade, the study in [ 91 , 92 ], compares radar, lidar, and camera performances in simulated and real-world adverse climatic environments and concludes that radar outperforms lidar and cameras under the influence of rain. In [ 93 , 94 ], the effect of aerosols upon the transmission of radar signals has been investigated in controlled environments and mining applications, and the results show that radar is not impacted by the presence of airborne particles, such as dust and smoke because of its wavelengths, which are much larger than the characteristic dimensions of dust.…”
Section: Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize sensor distortions, previous methods have been focused on evaluating automotive sensors in challenging situations such as dust, smoke, rain, fog and snow [40]. For these evaluations, testing facilities such as Cerema [8] and Carissma [18] provide reproducible adverse weather situations with defined and adjustable severity. In particular, cameras suffer from reduced contrast because particles in the air cause scattering [4,36].…”
Section: Depth Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%