2020
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in monitoring mobile populations: Applying bayesian multi‐site mark–recapture abundance estimation to the monitoring of a highly mobile coastal population of bottlenose dolphins

Abstract: Challenges in monitoring mobile populations -Applying Bayesian multi-site mark-recapture abundance estimation to the monitoring of a highly mobile coastal population of bottlenose dolphins Ingram, S

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, assessments of survey effort of terrestrial, avian and marine vertebrates using established monitoring approaches (e.g., line transect surveys, constant-effort-search surveys, capture-recapture) have demonstrated significant geographical and seasonal heterogeneity (e.g., wetland birds, Calladine et al, 2009;Wiest and Shriver, 2016; fin and sperm whales, Mannocci et al, 2018;bottlenose dolphins, Symons et al, 2018). Specifically, boat-based transects to quantify the size of cetacean populations range from six times a month at some locations (Smith et al, 2016) to two times a month during summer months only (Nykänen et al, 2020), with the latter potentially impeding records of recruitment and/or detection of growth/decline and associated factors (Wilson et al, 1999;Symons et al, 2018). For marine turtles, UASs provide an unprecedented opportunity to estimate the actual size of breeding populations empirically, including both males and females, which is not possible when using beach-monitoring counts alone that are based only on the female component of the population (i.e., track, nest or female counts), and typically require modelling approaches to infer population size (Jolly-Seber models [POPAN] or multi-state open robust design [MSORD]) (Chaloupka and Limpus, 2004;Pfaller et al, 2013;Schofield et al, 2017;Whiting et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, assessments of survey effort of terrestrial, avian and marine vertebrates using established monitoring approaches (e.g., line transect surveys, constant-effort-search surveys, capture-recapture) have demonstrated significant geographical and seasonal heterogeneity (e.g., wetland birds, Calladine et al, 2009;Wiest and Shriver, 2016; fin and sperm whales, Mannocci et al, 2018;bottlenose dolphins, Symons et al, 2018). Specifically, boat-based transects to quantify the size of cetacean populations range from six times a month at some locations (Smith et al, 2016) to two times a month during summer months only (Nykänen et al, 2020), with the latter potentially impeding records of recruitment and/or detection of growth/decline and associated factors (Wilson et al, 1999;Symons et al, 2018). For marine turtles, UASs provide an unprecedented opportunity to estimate the actual size of breeding populations empirically, including both males and females, which is not possible when using beach-monitoring counts alone that are based only on the female component of the population (i.e., track, nest or female counts), and typically require modelling approaches to infer population size (Jolly-Seber models [POPAN] or multi-state open robust design [MSORD]) (Chaloupka and Limpus, 2004;Pfaller et al, 2013;Schofield et al, 2017;Whiting et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-site approach would also allow the application of alternative mark-recapture models, e.g. using a Bayesian framework (Durban et al, 2005;Nykänen et al, 2020) or other spatially explicit approaches (Borchers & Efford, 2008). Ideally, line transect surveys specifically designed to ensure equal coverage probability in combination with distance sampling would be employed to conduct regular monitoring of cetacean abundance and distribution, as were conducted under the SCANS projects in the European Atlantic shelf waters, for example (Hammond et al, 2013).…”
Section: Implications For Conservation Biology and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%