2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16595-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Analytical Quality Assurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the horizontal and vertical accuracy (RMSE = 4 mm and 7 mm, respectively) of the orthophotos and DSMs, the discrepancy between the ground-based manual measurement method and the HSR-AP method could be from either method. This is because distress measurements made by inspectors involves random errors which cannot be avoided [61,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the horizontal and vertical accuracy (RMSE = 4 mm and 7 mm, respectively) of the orthophotos and DSMs, the discrepancy between the ground-based manual measurement method and the HSR-AP method could be from either method. This is because distress measurements made by inspectors involves random errors which cannot be avoided [61,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently, these are easy to recognize and the origins must be eliminated [Reichenbacher & Einax, 2011].…”
Section: Gross Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The upper action limit line UAL or upper warning limit line UWL is obtained by multiplying the average range R by tabulated multipliers D WL and D AL , which, for example, are given in [2].…”
Section: Meet Quality Assurance Challenge 11mentioning
confidence: 99%