2009
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0b013e318194618e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges for Scaling up ART in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Retrospective Study in Kibera, Kenya

Abstract: Despite free drugs and low associated costs, dropout probabilities in this study are higher and adherence to ART is lower compared with other studies from sub-Saharan Africa. Our results illustrate that ART programs in resource-limited settings, such as Kibera, risk low adherence and retention rates when expanding services. Specific and intensified patient support is needed to minimize the risk of dropout and nonadherence causing future significant health threats not only to individuals but also to public heal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The review included several estimates of retention in care from HIV programmes in Kenya, many of which were based on studies that were not specifically intended to quantify retention in care [5]. Estimates from studies specially designed to evaluate patient retention were retrospective chart reviews [6,7]. These studies were limited in that they were unable to determine the true status of those considered lost to follow-up (LTFU), potentially underestimating patient retention in care.…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review included several estimates of retention in care from HIV programmes in Kenya, many of which were based on studies that were not specifically intended to quantify retention in care [5]. Estimates from studies specially designed to evaluate patient retention were retrospective chart reviews [6,7]. These studies were limited in that they were unable to determine the true status of those considered lost to follow-up (LTFU), potentially underestimating patient retention in care.…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One previous study from an informal settlement in Kenya, found that 29% of the patients discontinued ART (Unge, et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 A 2009 study in Kibera, an urban slum in Nairobi, found that 29% of patients started on ART dropped out of the programme at least once for 90 days or more, and the probability of remaining in the programme at two years was only 65%. 7 Patient retention has also been difficult for prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) programmes. [8][9][10][11] There is even less literature on the true outcomes of TB defaulters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Modes of patient tracing briefly described in other studies include telephone calls, letters, outreach teams and home visits. 4,7,14,16,17,22 Classifying all patients whose vital status (e.g. death, transfer out) is unknown as LTFU contributes to inaccurate conclusions about the effectiveness of a given programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%